Literature DB >> 20382194

A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: genotoxicity. A COLIPA analysis.

Stefan Pfuhler1, Annette Kirst, Marilyn Aardema, Norbert Banduhn, Carsten Goebel, Daisuke Araki, Margit Costabel-Farkas, Eric Dufour, Rolf Fautz, James Harvey, Nicola J Hewitt, Jalila Hibatallah, Paul Carmichael, Martin Macfarlane, Kerstin Reisinger, Joanna Rowland, Florian Schellauf, Andreas Schepky, Julia Scheel.   

Abstract

For the assessment of genotoxic effects of cosmetic ingredients, a number of well-established and regulatory accepted in vitro assays are in place. A caveat to the use of these assays is their relatively low specificity and high rate of false or misleading positive results. Due to the 7th amendment to the EU Cosmetics Directive ban on in vivo genotoxicity testing for cosmetics that was enacted March 2009, it is no longer possible to conduct follow-up in vivo genotoxicity tests for cosmetic ingredients positive in in vitro genotoxicity tests to further assess the relevance of the in vitro findings. COLIPA, the European Cosmetics Association, has initiated a research programme to improve existing and develop new in vitro methods. A COLIPA workshop was held in Brussels in April 2008 to analyse the best possible use of available methods and approaches to enable a sound assessment of the genotoxic hazard of cosmetic ingredients. Common approaches of cosmetic companies are described, with recommendations for evaluating in vitro genotoxins using non-animal approaches. A weight of evidence approach was employed to set up a decision-tree for the integration of alternative methods into tiered testing strategies. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382194     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  13 in total

1.  Emerging approaches in predictive toxicology.

Authors:  Luoping Zhang; Cliona M McHale; Nigel Greene; Ronald D Snyder; Ivan N Rich; Marilyn J Aardema; Shambhu Roy; Stefan Pfuhler; Sundaresan Venkatactahalam
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Look back in anger - what clinical studies tell us about preclinical work.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 3.  State-of-the-art of 3D cultures (organs-on-a-chip) in safety testing and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Natalie Alépée; Anthony Bahinski; Mardas Daneshian; Bart De Wever; Ellen Fritsche; Alan Goldberg; Jan Hansmann; Thomas Hartung; John Haycock; Helena Hogberg; Lisa Hoelting; Jens M Kelm; Suzanne Kadereit; Emily McVey; Robert Landsiedel; Marcel Leist; Marc Lübberstedt; Fozia Noor; Christian Pellevoisin; Dirk Petersohn; Uwe Pfannenbecker; Kerstin Reisinger; Tzutzuy Ramirez; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Monika Schäfer-Korting; Katrin Zeilinger; Marie-Gabriele Zurich
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  Cell transformation assays for prediction of carcinogenic potential: state of the science and future research needs.

Authors:  Stuart Creton; Marilyn J Aardema; Paul L Carmichael; James S Harvey; Francis L Martin; Robert F Newbold; Michael R O'Donovan; Kamala Pant; Albrecht Poth; Ayako Sakai; Kiyoshi Sasaki; Andrew D Scott; Leonard M Schechtman; Rhine R Shen; Noriho Tanaka; Hemad Yasaei
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Simple and robust 3D bioprinting of full-thickness human skin tissue.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Zhengtong Zhou; Min Zhang; Feng Song; Chong Feng; Haochen Liu
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 6.832

6.  Comet assay in reconstructed 3D human epidermal skin models--investigation of intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility with coded chemicals.

Authors:  Astrid A Reus; Kerstin Reisinger; Thomas R Downs; Gregory J Carr; Andreas Zeller; Raffaella Corvi; Cyrille A M Krul; Stefan Pfuhler
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Effect of 2-acetylaminofluorene and its genotoxic metabolites on DNA adduct formation and DNA damage in 3D reconstructed human skin tissue models.

Authors:  Thomas R Downs; Volker M Arlt; Brenda C Barnett; Ryan Posgai; Stefan Pfuhler
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 8.  The C. elegans model in toxicity testing.

Authors:  Piper Reid Hunt
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.446

9.  Counting Caenorhabditis elegans: Protocol Optimization and Applications for Population Growth and Toxicity Studies in Liquid Medium.

Authors:  Leona D Scanlan; Steven P Lund; Sanem Hosbas Coskun; Shannon K Hanna; Monique E Johnson; Christopher M Sims; Karina Brignoni; Patricia Lapasset; Elijah J Petersen; John T Elliott; Bryant C Nelson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Stefan Pfuhler; Ralph Pirow; Thomas R Downs; Andrea Haase; Nicola Hewitt; Andreas Luch; Marion Merkel; Claudia Petrick; André Said; Monika Schäfer-Korting; Kerstin Reisinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.