Literature DB >> 20380909

Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving.

Panos Konstantopoulos1, Peter Chapman, David Crundall.   

Abstract

Road crashes are the main cause of death of young people in the developed world. The reasons that cause traffic crashes are numerous; however, most researchers agree that a lack of driving experience is one of the major contributing factors. In addition it has been demonstrated that environmental factors such as driving during night and rain increases the risk of a crash. Both of these factors may be related to drivers' visual search strategies that become more efficient with increased experience. In the present study we recorded the eye movements of driving instructors and learner drivers while they drove three virtual routes that included day, night and rain routes in a driving simulator. The results showed that driving instructors had an increased sampling rate, shorter processing time and broader scanning of the road than learner drivers. This broader scanning of the road could be possibly explained by the mirror inspection pattern which revealed that driving instructors fixated more on the side mirrors than learner drivers. Also it was found that poor visibility conditions, especially rain, decrease the effectiveness of drivers' visual search. The lack of interaction between driving experience and visibility suggests that some aspects of visual search are affected by general rather than situation specific driving experience. The present findings support the effect of driving experience in modifying eye movement strategies. The high accident risk of night and rain driving could be partly explained by the decrement in visual search strategies during these conditions. Finally it is argued that the use of driving simulators can provide valuable insights regarding driving safety. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20380909     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  26 in total

1.  Pupil Sizes Scale with Attentional Load and Task Experience in a Multiple Object Tracking Task.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Daniel P Ferris; W David Hairston; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Changes over 12 months in eye glances during secondary task engagement among novice drivers.

Authors:  Fearghal O'Brien; Sheila G Klauer; Johnathon Ehsani; Bruce G Simons-Morton
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2016-05-10

3.  Executive Function Brain Network Activation Predicts Driving Hazard Detection in ADHD.

Authors:  Haley M Bednarz; Despina Stavrinos; Austin M Svancara; Gabriela M Sherrod; Benjamin McManus; Hrishikesh D Deshpande; Rajesh K Kana
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Gaze During Locomotion in Virtual Reality and the Real World.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Sascha Feder; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Age-dependent visual exploration during simulated day- and night driving on a motorway: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Prabitha Urwyler; Nicole Gruber; René M Müri; Michael Jäger; Rahel Bieri; Thomas Nyffeler; Urs P Mosimann; Tobias Nef
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Designs and Algorithms to Map Eye Tracking Data with Dynamic Multielement Moving Objects.

Authors:  Ziho Kang; Saptarshi Mandal; Jerry Crutchfield; Angel Millan; Sarah N McClung
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 7.  Detecting driver drowsiness based on sensors: a review.

Authors:  Arun Sahayadhas; Kenneth Sundaraj; Murugappan Murugappan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Wildlife road traffic accidents: a standardized protocol for counting flattened fauna.

Authors:  Wendy J Collinson; Daniel M Parker; Ric T F Bernard; Brian K Reilly; Harriet T Davies-Mostert
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Emotion has no impact on attention in a change detection flicker task.

Authors:  Robert C A Bendall; Catherine Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-20

10.  Changes in Drivers' Visual Performance during the Collision Avoidance Process as a Function of Different Field of Views at Intersections.

Authors:  Xuedong Yan; Xinran Zhang; Yuting Zhang; Xiaomeng Li; Zhuo Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.