Literature DB >> 20380904

Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies.

Johnell O Brooks1, Richard R Goodenough, Matthew C Crisler, Nathan D Klein, Rebecca L Alley, Beatrice L Koon, William C Logan, Jennifer H Ogle, Richard A Tyrrell, Rebekkah F Wills.   

Abstract

While driving simulators are a valuable tool for assessing multiple dimensions of driving performance under relatively safe conditions, researchers and practitioners must be prepared for participants that suffer from simulator sickness. This paper describes multiple theories of motion sickness and presents a method for assessing and reacting to simulator sickness symptoms. Results showed that this method identified individuals who were unable to complete a driving simulator study due to simulator sickness with greater than 90% accuracy and that older participants had a greater likelihood of simulator sickness than younger participants. Possible explanations for increased symptoms experienced by older participants are discussed as well as implications for research ethics and simulator sickness prevention. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20380904     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  40 in total

Review 1.  A roadmap for interpreting the literature on vision and driving.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Joanne M Wood; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Manipulations to reduce simulator-related transient adverse health effects during simulated driving.

Authors:  M Jäger; N Gruber; R Müri; U P Mosimann; T Nef
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Interactive Tools for Measuring Visual Scanning Performance and Reaction Time.

Authors:  Johnell Brooks; Julia Seeanner; Sarah Hennessy; Joseph Manganelli; Matthew Crisler; Patrick Rosopa; Casey Jenkins; Michael Anderson; Nathalie Drouin; Leah Belle; Constance Truesdail; Stephanie Tanner
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr

4.  Driving simulation in the clinic: testing visual exploratory behavior in daily life activities in patients with visual field defects.

Authors:  Johanna Hamel; Antje Kraft; Sven Ohl; Sophie De Beukelaer; Heinrich J Audebert; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Using smartphone technology to deliver a virtual pedestrian environment: usability and validation.

Authors:  David C Schwebel; Joan Severson; Yefei He
Journal:  Virtual Real       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Validity and reliability of a driving simulator for evaluating the influence of medicinal drugs on driving performance.

Authors:  Mari Iwata; Kunihiro Iwamoto; Iwao Kitajima; Takasuke Nogi; Koichi Onishi; Yu Kajiyama; Izumi Nishino; Masahiko Ando; Norio Ozaki
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation.

Authors:  Markus Bahnemann; Johanna Hamel; Sophie De Beukelaer; Sven Ohl; Stefanie Kehrer; Heinrich Audebert; Antje Kraft; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Driving simulation as a performance-based test of visual impairment in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Erwin R Boer; Peter N Rosen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The effects of age on the contributions of head and eye movements to scanning behavior at intersections.

Authors:  Steven W Savage; Lily Zhang; Garrett Swan; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2020-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.