Literature DB >> 20380609

Survey on hearing aid outcome in Switzerland: associations with type of fitting (bilateral/unilateral), level of hearing aid signal processing, and hearing loss.

Sibylle Bertoli1, Daniel Bodmer, Rudolf Probst.   

Abstract

The present investigation further analysed results of a previously reported survey with a large sample of hearing aid owners (Bertoli et al, 2009) to determine the individual and technological factors related to hearing aid outcome. In particular the associations of hearing loss, level of signal processing, and fitting type (bilateral versus unilateral fitting) with hearing aid use, satisfaction with and management of the aid were evaluated. A sub-group with symmetrical hearing loss was analysed (n = 6027). Regular use was more frequent in bilateral users and in owners of devices with more complex signal processing, but the strongest determinant of regular use was severity of hearing loss. Satisfaction was higher in the group wearing simple devices, while fitting type and degree of hearing loss had no influence on satisfaction rates. Moderate and severe hearing loss was associated more frequently with poor management of the aid than mild hearing loss. It was concluded that bilateral amplification and advanced signal processing features may contribute to successful hearing aid fitting, but the resulting differences must be considered to be relatively small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20380609     DOI: 10.3109/14992020903473431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  9 in total

1.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Self-Assessed Hearing Handicap in Older Adults With Poorer-Than-Predicted Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids.

Authors:  Xunyi Wang; Yun Zheng; Yiran Liu; Jingzhe Lu; Zhiyuan Cui; Zhen Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Adoption by Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Weycker; Lauren K Dillard; Alex Pinto; Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Ted S Tweed
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  [User benefit of modern hearing aids. A comparative study].

Authors:  J Kießling; S Kreikemeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Benefit on daily listening with technological advancements: comparison of basic and premium category hearing aids.

Authors:  Praveen Prakash; Adithya Sreedhar; Jithin Raj Balan; Archana Mariam Varghese
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.236

7.  Long-Term Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Auditory Spectral Discrimination and Temporal Envelope Sensitivity and Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Yong-Hwi An; Eun Sub Lee; Dong Hyun Kim; Hyeon Sik Oh; Jong Ho Won; Hyun Joon Shim
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Validation of the Swedish Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (Screening Version) and Evaluation of Its Effect in Hearing Aid Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Maria Öberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility and Sound Localization Abilities with Hearing Aids Using Binaural Wireless Technology.

Authors:  Iman Ibrahim; Vijay Parsa; Ewan Macpherson; Margaret Cheesman
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-12-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.