Literature DB >> 31624394

[Barrier effect of improved porcine small intestinal submucosa absorbable membrane on early healing of mandibular defects in rabbits].

B W Li1, W Y Wu1, L Tang1, Y Zhang1, Y H Liu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the barrier effect of an absorbable barrier membrane made by small intestinal submucosa (SIS) compared with Bio-Gide collagen membrane.
METHODS: 12 healthy New Zealand male white rabbits were randomly assigned. A or B round bone defects with a depth of 2 mm and a diameter of 5 mm or 8 mm was made in each rabbit's mandibular. The following treatments were given respectively: covered with SIS membrane (S), covered with Bio-Gide membrane (G) and blank control (O). Then we got six groups: AS, AG, AO, BS, BG, and BO (n=4). After 4 weeks, the rabbits were sacrificed. The specimens were examined by naked-eye observation, new bone percentage (BV/TV) and bone mineralized density (BMD), which were measured and analyzed by Micro-CT. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS: After 4 weeks, Bio-Gide membranes were fused with the surrounding tissue while SIS membranes held the form with no significant degradation. In the AS, BS and AG groups, the absorbable membranes smoothly covered on the new bone. While in the BG group, Bio-Gide membranes collapsed to the center of the bone defects. The 3D reconstruction of Micro-CT showed that a large number of newly formed trabeculae were found in the four groups of AS, BS, AG, and BG. In the central subsidence area of the BG group, the newly formed trabeculae were sparse. However only a small amount of new bone trabecula appeared at the bottom of the defects in groups AO and BO. Micro-CT quantitative results showed that BV/TV (39.10%±0.79%) and BMD [(517.73±11.22) mg/cm3] of AS group were significantly higher than those of AO group [26.67%±1.12%, (319.81±8.00) mg/cm3] (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between AS group and AG group [38.15%±0.91%, (518.65±7.48) mg/cm3] (P>0.05). BV/TV (34.90%±1.35%) and BMD [(409.09±8.14) mg/cm3] of BS group were significantly higher than those of BO group [23.63%±2.07%, (171.00±16.24) mg/cm3] (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between BS and BG groups [33.40%±1.06%, (412.70±8.6) mg/cm3] (P>0.05). HE staining analysis revealed that significant bone formation was achieved in the AS, AG, BS and BG groups, and trabecular bone of AS and AG groups were thicker and denser. In AO and BO group, there were scattered new bone tissues in edges of host bone, and no coarse trabecular bone formed.
CONCLUSION: In the early healing of two sizes bone defects in rabbit mandibular, SIS membrane and Bio-Gide membrane have a similar barrier effect in guided bone regeneration. And SIS membrane's ability to maintain space for bone regeneration seems to be better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31624394      PMCID: PMC7433515     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  16 in total

1.  Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  N U Zitzmann; P Schärer; C P Marinello
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS): a bioscaffold supporting in vitro primary human epidermal cell differentiation and synthesis of basement membrane proteins.

Authors:  K Lindberg; S F Badylak
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 3.  Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen barrier membranes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Jan Behring; Rüdiger Junker; X Frank Walboomers; Betsy Chessnut; John A Jansen
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan membrane with asymmetric structure and its applications in guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ying Tu; Chen Chen; Yubao Li; Yi Hou; Min Huang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.300

Review 5.  Small intestinal submucosa segments as matrix for tissue engineering: review.

Authors:  Birgit Andrée; Antonia Bär; Axel Haverich; Andres Hilfiker
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 6.  Small intestinal submucosa extracellular matrix (CorMatrix®) in cardiovascular surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zahra Mosala Nezhad; Alain Poncelet; Laurent de Kerchove; Pierre Gianello; Caroline Fervaille; Gebrine El Khoury
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-23

7.  The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions.

Authors:  J P Schmitz; J O Hollinger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Long-term bio-degradation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barriers in human guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Haim Tal; Avital Kozlovsky; Zvi Artzi; Carlos E Nemcovsky; Ofer Moses
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Gian A Hälg; Daniel S Thoma; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Assessment of dehydrothermally cross-linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration around peri-implant dehiscence defects: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Lee; Jung-Seok Lee; Won-Sun Baek; Hyun-Chang Lim; Jae-Kook Cha; Seong-Ho Choi; Ui-Won Jung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.614

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Effects of different crosslinking treatments on the properties of decellularized small intestinal submucosa porous scaffolds].

Authors:  Y Deng; Y Zhang; B W Li; M Wang; L Tang; Y H Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 2.  Advances in Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques.

Authors:  Ze Yang; Chang Wu; Huixin Shi; Xinyu Luo; Hui Sun; Qiang Wang; Dan Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.