Literature DB >> 2037908

Symptoms and microenvironmental measures in nonproblem buildings.

M J Hodgson1, J Frohliger, E Permar, C Tidwell, N D Traven, S A Olenchock, M Karpf.   

Abstract

Symptoms commonly defined as the sick building syndrome were studied in a cross-sectional investigation of 147 office workers in five building areas using a linear-analog self-assessment scale questionnaire to define symptoms at a specific point in time. At the same time, the environment in the breathing zone was characterized by measuring thermal parameters (dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, air speed, and radiant temperature), volatile organic compounds, respirable suspended particulates, noise and light intensity, and carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide levels. Demographic characteristics of the occupants and building characteristics were recorded. Up to 25% of the variance in regression models could be explained for mucous membrane irritation and central nervous system symptoms. These two symptom groups were related to the concentrations of volatile organic compounds, to crowding, to layers of clothing, and to measured levels of lighting intensity. Chest tightness was also related to lighting intensity. Skin complaints were related only to gender. Gender, age, and education failed to demonstrate a consistent relationship with symptom categories. This study suggests that the sick building syndrome may have specific environmental causes, including lighting and volatile organic compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2037908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  11 in total

1.  Building sickness syndrome in healthy and unhealthy buildings: an epidemiological and environmental assessment with cluster analysis.

Authors:  R M Niven; A M Fletcher; C A Pickering; E B Faragher; I N Potter; W B Booth; T J Jones; P D Potter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Symptoms in relation to chemicals and dampness in newly built dwellings.

Authors:  Y Saijo; R Kishi; F Sata; Y Katakura; Y Urashima; A Hatakeyama; S Kobayashi; K Jin; N Kurahashi; T Kondo; Y Y Gong; T Umemura
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Epidemiology of sick building syndrome and its associated risk factors in Singapore.

Authors:  P L Ooi; K T Goh; M H Phoon; S C Foo; H M Yap
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Prevalence of objective eye manifestations in people working in office buildings with different prevalences of the sick building syndrome compared with the general population.

Authors:  C Franck; E Bach; P Skov
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  A pilot study of indoor air quality in screen golf courses.

Authors:  Sun-Ju Nam Goung; Jinho Yang; Yoon Shin Kim; Cheol Min Lee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Sick-building syndrome fatigue as a possible predation defense.

Authors:  A C Chester
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Indoor environmental exposures and symptoms.

Authors:  Michael Hodgson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  The work environment and workers' health in four large office buildings.

Authors:  H Jasmine Chao; Joel Schwartz; Donald K Milton; Harriet A Burge
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Needs and opportunities for improving the health, safety, and productivity of medical research facilities.

Authors:  M Hodgson; W Brodt; D Henderson; V Loftness; A Rosenfeld; J Woods; R Wright
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Health effects of a mixture of indoor air volatile organics, their ozone oxidation products, and stress.

Authors:  Nancy Fiedler; Robert Laumbach; Kathie Kelly-McNeil; Paul Lioy; Zhi-Hua Fan; Junfeng Zhang; John Ottenweller; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Howard Kipen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.