Literature DB >> 20378272

Analysis of prostate bed motion using daily cone-beam computed tomography during postprostatectomy radiotherapy.

Piet Ost1, Gert De Meerleer, Werner De Gersem, Aline Impens, Wilfried De Neve.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report on the interfraction total positioning error of the postoperative prostate bed and to quantify its components (bony misalignment [BM] and prostate bed motion [PBM]) using daily kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The role of an adaptive radiotherapy schedule (ART) was investigated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 547 daily CBCT images from 15 consecutive patients who had been treated with prostate bed radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The positioning error was measured by rigid co-registration of the daily CBCT with pretreatment CT planning scan. The total positioning error was quantified by co-registration of the CBCT with the CT planning scan to match the anterior rectal wall. Automatic bony pelvis co-registration was performed to separate BM and PBM. The ART was determined by the average total positioning error from the first 5 CBCT images.
RESULTS: The systematic error for the total positioning error in the left-right, superoinferior, and anteroposterior direction was 2.69, 2.00, and 2.65 mm with a random error of 1.99, 1.49, and 2.25 mm, resulting in a planning target volume margin of 8, 6, and 8 mm, respectively. ART reduced the margin by 54%, 44%, and 40%, respectively. Systematic errors in the left-right, superoinferior, and anteroposterior direction for BM was 2.66, 1.83, and 2.60 mm and for PBM was 0.44, 0.92, and 2.50 mm with a random error of 1.88, 1.24, and 1.77 mm for BM and 0.99, 1.38, and 2.32 mm for PBM, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Without treatment verifications, 6-8-mm planning target volume margins are required because of PBM and BM. The anteroposterior PBM was significant. An ART protocol can reduce these planning target volume margins.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20378272     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  Risk factors related to interfractional variation in whole pelvic irradiation for locally advanced pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  W S Yoon; D S Yang; J A Lee; S Lee; Y J Park; C Y Kim
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  [Conventional certain safety margin captures the prostate after partial prostatectomy].

Authors:  Martina Becker-Schiebe; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Comparison between manual and automatic image registration in image-guided radiation therapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography with an imaging beam line for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Hashido; Shinya Nakasone; Mari Fukao; Seiichi Ota; Shinichi Inoue
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-21

4.  Evaluating deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT.

Authors:  Ana Cravo Sá; Ana Peres; Mónica Pereira; Carina Marques Coelho; Fátima Monsanto; Ana Macedo; Adrian Lamas
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-12-29

5.  Adaptive radiation therapy for postprostatectomy patients using real-time electromagnetic target motion tracking during external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Mingyao Zhu; Shyam Bharat; Jeff M Michalski; Hiram A Gay; Wei-Hsien Hou; Parag J Parikh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Variation in patient position and impact on carbon-ion scanning beam distribution during prostate treatment.

Authors:  S Mori; T Inaniwa; K Miki; K Tanimoto; M Tajiri; D Kuroiwa; M Nakao; Y Shiraishi; K Shibayama; H Tsuji
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Postprostatectomy ultrasound-guided transrectal implantation of gold markers for external beam radiotherapy. Technique and complications rate.

Authors:  J F Langenhuijsen; R Donker; G M McColl; L A L M Kiemeney; J A Witjes; E N J T van Lin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Total error shift patterns for daily CT on rails image-guided radiotherapy to the prostate bed.

Authors:  Ronaldo Cavalieri; Hiram A Gay; Jingxia Liu; Maria C Ferreira; Helvecio C Mota; Claudio H Sibata; Ron R Allison
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Determining optimal planning target volume and image guidance policy for post-prostatectomy intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Linda J Bell; Jennifer Cox; Thomas Eade; Marianne Rinks; Alan Herschtal; Andrew Kneebone
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Definition and visualisation of regions of interest in post-prostatectomy image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Linda J Bell; Jennifer Cox; Thomas Eade; Marianne Rinks; Andrew Kneebone
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.