Literature DB >> 20377582

Anatomical retro-apical technique of synchronous (posterior and anterior) urethral transection: a novel approach for ameliorating apical margin positivity during robotic radical prostatectomy.

Ashutosh K Tewari1, Abhishek Srivastava, Kumaran Mudaliar, Gerald Y Tan, Sonal Grover, Youssef El Douaihy, David Peters, Robert Leung, Rajiv Yadav, Majnu John, James Wysock, E Daracott Vaughan, Sara Muir, Mahul B Amin, Mark Rubin, Jiangling Tu, Mohammed Akthar, Maria Shevchuk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel synchronous approach to apical dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) which augments circumferential visual appreciation of the prostatic apex and membranous urethra anatomy, and assess its effect on apical margin positivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Positive surgical margins (PSM) during RP predispose to earlier biochemical recurrence, and occur most frequently at the prostatic apex. Conventional apical transection after early ligation of the dorsal venous complex (DVC) remains suboptimal, as this approach obscures visualization of the intersection between prostatic apex and membranous urethra, leading to inadvertent apical capsulotomy and eventual margin positivity. A synchronous urethral transection commenced via a retro-apical approach was adopted in 209 consecutive patients undergoing RARP by one surgeon (A.T.) between April to September 2009. The apical margin rates for this group were compared with those of 1665 previous patients who received conventional urethral transection via an anterior approach after DVC ligation. Outcomes were adjusted for differences in clinicopathological variables. All RP specimens were processed according to institutional protocols, and examined by dedicated genitourinary pathologists. The location of PSMs was identified as apex, posterior, posterolateral, bladder neck, anterior, base, or multifocal.
RESULTS: Patients receiving synchronous urethral transection had significantly lower apical PSM rates than the control group (1.4% vs 4.4%, P = 0.04). This marked improvement in the retro-apical group occurred despite a significantly higher incidence of aggressive cancer (≥ pT3a) documented on final specimen pathology (16% vs 10%, P = 0.027).Technical difficulty was encountered in three of 209 study patients, in whom urethral transection had to be completed using the classic anterior approach.
CONCLUSION: Improved circumferential visualization of the prostatic apex, membranous urethra and their anatomical intersection facilitates precise dissection of the apex and its surrounding neural scaffold, and optimizes membranous urethral preservation. This has significantly ameliorated apical PSM rates in patients undergoing RARP, despite having to deal with more aggressive cancer on final specimen pathology.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20377582     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09318.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Prevalence and risk factors of contralateral extraprostatic extension in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for unilateral disease at biopsy: A global multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Marc Bienz; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Vincent Trudeau; Abdullah M Alenizi; Roger Valdivieso; Modar Alom; Mevlana Derya Balbay; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Vladimir Mouraviev; David M Albala; Assaad El-Hakim; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mathieu Latour; Fred Saad; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Andrew Evans; John Srigley; Joseph L Chin; Bish Bora; Amber Hunter; Robin McLeod; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Commentary: Robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective approach for treating localized prostate cancer--is it technique or technician?

Authors:  Ashutosh Tewari; Misop Han
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A cohort study investigating patient expectations and satisfaction outcomes in men undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Youssef El Douaihy; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Mayank Agarwal; Abhishek Srivastava; Sonal Grover; Kumaran Mudaliar; Sivaram Rajan; Amanda Lawlor; Robert Leung; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies.

Authors:  Harveer Dev; David Rickman; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Sonal Grover; Robert Leung; Robert Kim; Naoki Kitabayashi; Raquel Esqueva; Kyung Park; Jessica Padilla; Mark Rubin; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Pathological outcomes and strategies to achieve optimal cancer control during robotic radical prostatectomy in Asian-Indian men.

Authors:  Ashutosh K Tewari; Abhishek Srivastava; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Sonal Grover; Snider Desir; Harveer Dev; Rajiv Yadav; Robert Leung; Maria Shevchuk
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-07

Review 8.  Techniques of robotic radical prostatectomy for the management of prostate cancer: which one, when and why.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Ashok Hemal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

9.  Novel anatomical apical dissection utilizing puboprostatic "open-collar" technique: Impact on apical surgical margin and early continence recovery.

Authors:  Fumitaka Koga; Masaya Ito; Madoka Kataoka; Hiroshi Fukushima; Yasukazu Nakanishi; Kosuke Takemura; Hiroaki Suzuki; Kazumasa Sakamoto; Shuichiro Kobayashi; Ken-Ichi Tobisu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A review of technical progression in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eric Y Cho; Kevin K Yang; Ziho Lee; Daniel D Eun
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.