Literature DB >> 20377286

A set of high-order spatiotemporal stimuli that elicit motion and reverse-phi percepts.

Qin Hu1, Jonathan D Victor.   

Abstract

Detection of motion is a crucial component of visual processing. To probe the computations underlying motion perception, we created a new class of non-Fourier motion stimuli, characterized by their third- and fourth-order spatiotemporal correlations. As with other non-Fourier stimuli, they lack second-order correlations, and therefore their motion cannot be detected by standard Fourier mechanisms. Additionally, these stimuli lack pairwise spatiotemporal correlation of edges or flicker-and thus, also cannot be detected by extraction of one of these features, followed by standard motion analysis. Nevertheless, many of these stimuli produced apparent motion in human observers. The pattern of responses-i.e., which specific spatiotemporal correlations led to a percept of motion-was highly consistent across subjects. For many of these stimuli, inverting the overall contrast of the stimulus reversed the direction of apparent motion. This "reverse-phi" phenomenon challenges existing models, including models that correlate low-level features and gradient models. Our findings indicate that current knowledge of the computations underlying motion processing is as yet incomplete, and that understanding how high-order spatiotemporal correlations lead to motion percepts will illuminate the computations underlying early motion processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20377286      PMCID: PMC2869441          DOI: 10.1167/10.3.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  10 in total

Review 1.  Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update.

Authors:  Z L Lu; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Illusory reversal of visual depth and movement during changes of contrast.

Authors:  S M Anstis; B J Rogers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells.

Authors:  A Johnston; P W McOwan; H Buxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1992-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  LCD motion blur reduction: a signal processing approach.

Authors:  Shay Har-Noy; Truong Q Nguyen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Spatial organization of nonlinear interactions in form perception.

Authors:  J D Victor; M M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Nonlinear preprocessing in short-range motion.

Authors:  E Taub; J D Victor; M M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Phi movement as a subtraction process.

Authors:  S M Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Effects of luminance and contrast on direction of ambiguous apparent motion.

Authors:  S M Anstis; G Mather
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics.

Authors:  B Julesz; E N Gilbert; J D Victor
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1978-12-05       Impact factor: 2.086

  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Evidence and Counterevidence in Motion Perception.

Authors:  Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Asymmetric ON-OFF processing of visual motion cancels variability induced by the structure of natural scenes.

Authors:  James E Fitzgerald; Damon A Clark; Juyue Chen; Holly B Mandel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Symmetries in stimulus statistics shape the form of visual motion estimators.

Authors:  James E Fitzgerald; Alexander Y Katsov; Thomas R Clandinin; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Perception of second- and third-order orientation signals and their interactions.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Daniel J Thengone; Mary M Conte
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The statistics of local motion signals in naturalistic movies.

Authors:  Eyal I Nitzany; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Asymmetry of Drosophila ON and OFF motion detectors enhances real-world velocity estimation.

Authors:  Aljoscha Leonhardt; Georg Ammer; Matthias Meier; Etienne Serbe; Armin Bahl; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Direction Selectivity in Drosophila Emerges from Preferred-Direction Enhancement and Null-Direction Suppression.

Authors:  Jonathan Chit Sing Leong; Jennifer Judson Esch; Ben Poole; Surya Ganguli; Thomas Robert Clandinin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Heterogeneous Temporal Contrast Adaptation in Drosophila Direction-Selective Circuits.

Authors:  Catherine A Matulis; Juyue Chen; Aneysis D Gonzalez-Suarez; Rudy Behnia; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Textures as Probes of Visual Processing.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte; Charles F Chubb
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

10.  Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans.

Authors:  Margarida Agrochao; Ryosuke Tanaka; Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.