Literature DB >> 2037676

Comparison of microbiologic assay methods for hemodialysis fluids.

M J Arduino1, L A Bland, S M Aguero, L Carson, M Ridgeway, M S Favero.   

Abstract

To help prevent pyrogenic reactions and bacteremia in hemodialysis patients, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the Centers for Disease Control recommend microbiologic assay of hemodialysis fluids at least monthly. Five commercially available assay systems were evaluated by using the membrane filtration technique with standard methods agar and trypticase soy agar as the standards for comparison. Each assay system was challenged with dialysate and reverse-osmosis water from local dialysis centers, aqueous suspensions of eight laboratory strains of gram-negative bacilli and nontuberculous mycobacteria, and a mixed microbial flora inoculated into reverse-osmosis water and laboratory-prepared dialysate. Mean viable counts from triplicate samples were obtained after incubation at 37 degrees C for up to 72 h. The efficiency of recovery varied with the specific type of microbial challenge. The SPC water sampler (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.) was the most consistent in obtaining the highest viable counts. Other commercial systems were comparable to each other in overall performance. All assay systems tested provided an acceptable balance between microbial recovery and required sampling time, equipment, and expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2037676      PMCID: PMC269824          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.592-594.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Gram-negative water bacteria in hemodialysis systems.

Authors:  M S Favero; N J Petersen; L A Carson; W W Bond; S H Hindman
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1975-10

2.  Outbreak of gram-negative bacteremia and pyrogenic reactions in a hemodialysis center.

Authors:  C M Beck-Sague; W R Jarvis; L A Bland; M J Arduino; S M Aguero; G Verosic
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.754

3.  Reuse of hemodialyzers. Results of nationwide surveillance for adverse effects.

Authors:  M J Alter; M S Favero; J K Miller; P J Coleman; L A Bland
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Potential bacteriologic and endotoxin hazards associated with liquid bicarbonate concentrate.

Authors:  L A Bland; M R Ridgeway; S M Aguero; L A Carson; M S Favero
Journal:  ASAIO Trans       Date:  1987 Jul-Sep

5.  Microbial contamination of renal dialysis systems and associated health risks.

Authors:  M S Favero; N J Petersen; K M Boyer; L A Carson; W W Bond
Journal:  Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs       Date:  1974

6.  Endotoxemia in febrile reactions during hemodialysis.

Authors:  L Raij; F L Shapiro; A F Michael
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Pyrogenic reactions during haemodialysis caused by extramural endotoxin.

Authors:  S H Hindman; M S Favero; L A Carson; N J Petersen; L B Schonberger; J T Solano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Mycobacterium chelonae infection among patients receiving high-flux dialysis in a hemodialysis clinic in California.

Authors:  P W Lowry; C M Beck-Sague; L A Bland; S M Aguero; M J Arduino; A N Minuth; R A Murray; J M Swenson; W R Jarvis
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.226

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effects of incubation time and temperature on microbiologic sampling procedures for hemodialysis fluids.

Authors:  M J Arduino; L A Bland; S M Aguero; M S Favero
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Hemodialysis and water quality.

Authors:  Angela D Coulliette; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.455

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.