Literature DB >> 2037611

A technique for quantifying the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine in vivo.

M A Adams1, P Dolan.   

Abstract

The bending properties of cadaveric lumbar spines were measured and used to convert in vivo measurements of lumbar flexion into bending moments ('stresses'). Forty-two lumbar motion segments were subjected to complex physiological loading and graphs were obtained of bending moment vs flexion angle. Variability was reduced by expressing both variables as a percentage of their values at the elastic limit. Data were averaged for each lumbar level, and a composite bending curve was compiled for the lumbar spine, L1-S1. A linear relationship was established between lumbar flexion measured in vitro and in vivo. This enabled values of 'per cent lumbar flexion' measured in vivo to be converted into 'per cent maximum bending moment' with a maximum likely error of about +/- 8%, which is equivalent to about +/- 5 Nm at L5-S1 for an average person. The technique was applied to 28 subjects, using dynamic measurements of lumbar flexion obtained with the '3-Space Isotrack' system. The bending moment at L5-S1 was 12 Nm on average when picking a pen up off the floor. Highly significant increases in bending moment were observed when heavier and bulkier objects were lifted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2037611     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90356-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  22 in total

1.  Factors contributing to low back pain in rowers.

Authors:  D A Reid; P J McNair
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Why exercise in paraplegia?

Authors:  M Kjaer
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Katrin Knecht; Gordana Balaban; Jiri Dvorak; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  An in vitro biomechanical comparison of Cadisc™-L with natural lumbar discs in axial compression and sagittal flexion.

Authors:  Donal McNally; Jason Naylor; Scott Johnson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Incorporating Six Degree-of-Freedom Intervertebral Joint Stiffness in a Lumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model-Method and Performance in Flexed Postures.

Authors:  Xiangjie Meng; Alexander G Bruno; Bo Cheng; Wenjun Wang; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Biological risk indicators for recurrent non-specific low back pain in adolescents.

Authors:  M A Jones; G Stratton; T Reilly; V B Unnithan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Lumbar-pelvic range and coordination during lifting tasks.

Authors:  A Maduri; B L Pearson; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 2.368

9.  Tensile properties of the annulus fibrosus II. Ultimate tensile strength and fatigue life.

Authors:  T P Green; M A Adams; P Dolan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Abnormal stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs following damage to the vertebral bodies: a cause of disc failure?

Authors:  M A Adams; D S McNally; J Wagstaff; A E Goodship
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.