PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of quantitative (1)H MR spectroscopy (MRS) using the external standard method to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with an anthracycline-based regimen in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with breast cancer were included. Tumor response to chemotherapy was evaluated after the second cycle using MRI and MRS. Final histopathology following surgery after four cycles of chemotherapy served as reference. RESULTS: The average normalized choline (Cho) signal was 1.2 (range, 0.40 to 2.8). There were no significant differences in the baseline tumor size and normalized Cho signals between the pathological responders (n = 8) and nonresponders (n = 8). The reduction rates of the normalized Cho signal were statistically significantly different between the pathological responders and nonresponders (P = 0.004), whereas the reduction rates of the lesion size were not significantly different between the two groups. When 40-50% of the reduction rates of the normalized Cho was chosen as the cutoff value, the positive and negative predictive values of MRS were 89% (8/9) and 100% (7/7), respectively. CONCLUSION: The changes in Cho after the second cycle of chemotherapy as determined by quantitative MRS may be more sensitive than changes in the tumor size to predict the pathological response. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of quantitative (1)H MR spectroscopy (MRS) using the external standard method to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with an anthracycline-based regimen in breast cancerpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with breast cancer were included. Tumor response to chemotherapy was evaluated after the second cycle using MRI and MRS. Final histopathology following surgery after four cycles of chemotherapy served as reference. RESULTS: The average normalized choline (Cho) signal was 1.2 (range, 0.40 to 2.8). There were no significant differences in the baseline tumor size and normalized Cho signals between the pathological responders (n = 8) and nonresponders (n = 8). The reduction rates of the normalized Cho signal were statistically significantly different between the pathological responders and nonresponders (P = 0.004), whereas the reduction rates of the lesion size were not significantly different between the two groups. When 40-50% of the reduction rates of the normalized Cho was chosen as the cutoff value, the positive and negative predictive values of MRS were 89% (8/9) and 100% (7/7), respectively. CONCLUSION: The changes in Cho after the second cycle of chemotherapy as determined by quantitative MRS may be more sensitive than changes in the tumor size to predict the pathological response. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Patrick J Bolan; Eunhee Kim; Benjamin A Herman; Gillian M Newstead; Mark A Rosen; Mitchell D Schnall; Etta D Pisano; Paul T Weatherall; Elizabeth A Morris; Constance D Lehman; Michael Garwood; Michael T Nelson; Douglas Yee; Sandra M Polin; Laura J Esserman; Constantine A Gatsonis; Gregory J Metzger; David C Newitt; Savannah C Partridge; Nola M Hylton Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Guihua Zhai; Hyunki Kim; David Sarver; Sharon Samuel; Lee Whitworth; Heidi Umphrey; Denise K Oelschlager; T Mark Beasley; Kurt R Zinn Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Tone F Bathen; Mariann G Heldahl; Beathe Sitter; Riyas Vettukattil; Anna Bofin; Steinar Lundgren; Ingrid S Gribbestad Journal: MAGMA Date: 2011-09-10 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Jared A Weis; Xia Li; Adrienne N Dula; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Seth A Smith; Michael I Miga; Vandana G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Date: 2012-10