Literature DB >> 20371906

Tumor motion prediction with the diaphragm as a surrogate: a feasibility study.

Laura I Cerviño1, Yan Jiang, Ajay Sandhu, Steve B Jiang.   

Abstract

We have previously assessed the use of the diaphragm as a surrogate for predicting real-time tumor position with linear models built with training data extracted from the same treatment fraction (Cerviño et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 3529-41). However, practical use in the clinical setting requires the capability of predicting tumor position throughout the treatment course using a model built at the beginning of the course. We evaluate the inter-fraction applicability of linear models to predict superior-inferior tumor position based on diaphragm position using 21 fluoroscopic sequences from five lung cancer patients. Tumor position is predicted with models built during the first fluoroscopic sequence of each patient. Other fluoroscopic sets are registered to the first set with five different methods. The mean localization prediction error and maximum error at a 95% confidence level averaged over all patients are found to be 1.2 mm and 2.9 mm, respectively, for bony registration and 1.2 mm and 2.8 mm, respectively, for registration based on the mean position of the tumor in the first two breathing cycles. Other registration methods produce larger prediction errors. In the clinical setting, this prediction error could be added as a margin to the target volume. We therefore conclude that it is feasible to predict lung tumor motion with diaphragm with sufficient accuracy in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20371906     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/9/N01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Gating window dependency on scanned carbon-ion beam dose distribution and imaging dose for thoracoabdominal treatment.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Masataka Karube; Shigeo Yasuda; Naoyoshi Yamamoto; Hiroshi Tsuji; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  A Minimally Interactive Method for Labeling Respiratory Phases in Free-Breathing Thoracic Dynamic MRI for Constructing 4D Images.

Authors:  Changjian Sun; Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; Caiyun Wu; Shuxu Guo; Joseph M McDonough; Drew A Torigian; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Respiratory Motion Prediction Using Deep Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Network.

Authors:  Shahabedin Nabavi; Monireh Abdoos; Mohsen Ebrahimi Moghaddam; Mohammad Mohammadi
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2020-04-25

4.  Audiovisual biofeedback improves motion prediction accuracy.

Authors:  Sean Pollock; Danny Lee; Paul Keall; Taeho Kim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of mechanical accuracy for couch-based tracking system (CBTS).

Authors:  Suk Lee; Kyung-Hwan Chang; Jand Bo Shim; Yuanjie Cao; Chang Ki Lee; Sam Ju Cho; Dae Sik Yang; Young Je Park; Won Seob Yoon; Chul Yong Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Stability and Reliability of Enhanced External-Internal Motion Correlation via Dynamic Phase-Shift Corrections Over 30-min Timeframe for Respiratory-Gated Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Andrew Milewski; Guang Li
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

7.  Abdominal organ position variation in children during image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sophie C Huijskens; Irma W E M van Dijk; Jorrit Visser; Brian V Balgobind; D Te Lindert; Coen R N Rasch; Tanja Alderliesten; Arjan Bel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.