Literature DB >> 20371676

Aprataxin tumor levels predict response of colorectal cancer patients to irinotecan-based treatment.

Higinio Dopeso1, Silvia Mateo-Lozano, Elena Elez, Stefania Landolfi, Francisco Javier Ramos Pascual, Javier Hernández-Losa, Rocco Mazzolini, Paulo Rodrigues, Sarah Bazzocco, Maria Josep Carreras, Eloy Espín, Manel Armengol, Andrew J Wilson, John M Mariadason, Santiago Ramon Y Cajal, Josep Tabernero, Simo Schwartz, Diego Arango.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Irinotecan (CPT11) treatment significantly improves the survival of colorectal cancer patients and is routinely used for the treatment of these patients, alone or in combination with other agents. However, only 20% to 30% of patients show an objective response to irinotecan, and there is great need for new molecular markers capable of identifying the subset of patients who are unlikely to respond. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Here we used microarray analysis of a panel of 30 colorectal cancer cell lines and immunohistochemistry to identify and validate a new biomarker of response to irinotecan.
RESULTS: A good correlation was observed between irinotecan sensitivity and the expression of aprataxin (APTX), a histidine triad domain superfamily protein involved in DNA repair. Moreover, using an isogenic in vitro system deficient in APTX, we show that aprataxin directly regulates the cellular sensitivity to camptothecin, suggesting that it could be used to predict patient response to irinotecan. We constructed a tissue microarray containing duplicate tumor samples from 135 patients that received irinotecan for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Immunohistochemical assessment of the tumor levels of aprataxin showed a significant association with treatment response and patient survival. Patients with low aprataxin had longer progression-free (9.2 versus 5.5 months; P = 0.03) and overall survival (36.7 versus 19.0 months; P = 0.008) than patients with high tumor aprataxin. No associations were found between coding APTX variants and aprataxin levels or camptothecin sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that aprataxin tumor levels can be used to identify patients with low probability of response to irinotecan-based therapy who are ideal candidates to receive treatment with alternative agents in an attempt to improve patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20371676     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  21 in total

1.  Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Kaori Shima; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Nadine J McCleary; Kimmie Ng; Donna Hollis; Leonard B Saltz; Robert J Mayer; Paul Schaefer; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B Benson; Donna Spiegelman; Richard M Goldberg; Monica M Bertagnolli; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Resonance assignment for a particularly challenging protein based on systematic unlabeling of amino acids to complement incomplete NMR data sets.

Authors:  Peter Bellstedt; Thomas Seiboth; Sabine Häfner; Henriette Kutscha; Ramadurai Ramachandran; Matthias Görlach
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Inter-individual variation in DNA repair capacity: a need for multi-pathway functional assays to promote translational DNA repair research.

Authors:  Zachary D Nagel; Isaac A Chaim; Leona D Samson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-26

4.  Clinical and cellular roles for TDP1 and TOP1 in modulating colorectal cancer response to irinotecan.

Authors:  Cornelia Meisenberg; Duncan C Gilbert; Anthony Chalmers; Vikki Haley; Simon Gollins; Simon E Ward; Sherif F El-Khamisy
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 5.  Topoisomerase I expression in tumors as a biological marker for CPT-11 chemosensitivity in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masahide Ikeguchi; Yosuke Arai; Yoshihiko Maeta; Keigo Ashida; Kuniyuki Katano; Toshiro Wakatsuki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  DNA repair: from genome maintenance to biomarker and therapeutic target.

Authors:  Shadia Jalal; Jennifer N Earley; John J Turchi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  RNA-seq reveals determinants for irinotecan sensitivity/resistance in colorectal cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Xin-Xiang Li; Hong-Tu Zheng; Jun-Jie Peng; Li-Yong Huang; De-Bing Shi; Lei Liang; San-Jun Cai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-04-15

8.  Predictive and prognostic analysis of PIK3CA mutation in stage III colon cancer intergroup trial.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Xiaoyun Liao; Yu Imamura; Mai Yamauchi; Nadine J McCleary; Kimmie Ng; Donna Niedzwiecki; Leonard B Saltz; Robert J Mayer; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B Benson; Rex B Mowat; Donna Spiegelman; Richard M Goldberg; Monica M Bertagnolli; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Synergistic anticancer effects of polyphyllin I and evodiamine on freshly-removed human gastric tumors.

Authors:  Guofeng Yue; Jia Wei; Xiaoping Qian; Lixia Yu; Zhengyun Zou; Wenxian Guan; Hao Wang; Jie Shen; Baorui Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A three-gene signature as potential predictive biomarker for irinotecan sensitivity in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Jia Wei; Hao Wang; Guofeng Yue; Lixia Yu; Yang Yang; Li Xie; Zhengyun Zou; Xiaoping Qian; Yitao Ding; Wenxian Guan; Baorui Liu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.