Literature DB >> 20368555

Intratumor heterogeneity and precision of microarray-based predictors of breast cancer biology and clinical outcome.

William T Barry1, Dawn N Kernagis, Holly K Dressman, Ryan J Griffis, J'vonne D Hunter, John A Olson, Jeff R Marks, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Paul K Marcom, Joseph R Nevins, Joseph Geradts, Michael B Datto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Identifying sources of variation in expression microarray data and the effect of variance in gene expression measurements on complex predictive and diagnostic models is essential when translating microarray-based experimental approaches into clinical assays. The technical reproducibility of microarray platforms is well established. Here, we investigate the additional impact of intratumor heterogeneity, a largely unstudied component of variance, on the performance of several microarray-based assays in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Genome-wide expression profiling was performed on 50 core needle biopsies from 18 breast cancer patients using Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. Global profiles of expression were characterized using unsupervised clustering methods and variance components models. Array-based measures of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status were compared with immunohistochemistry. The precision of genomic predictors of ER pathway status, recurrence risk, and sensitivity to chemotherapeutics was evaluated by interclass correlation.
RESULTS: Global patterns of gene expression demonstrated that intratumor variation was substantially less than the total variation observed across the patient population. Nevertheless, a fraction of genes exhibited significant intratumor heterogeneity in expression. A high degree of reproducibility was observed in single-gene predictors of ER (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.94) and PR expression (ICC = 0.90), and in a multigene predictor of ER pathway activation (ICC = 0.98) with high concordance with immunohistochemistry. Substantial agreement was also observed for multigene signatures of cancer recurrence (ICC = 0.71) and chemotherapeutic sensitivity (ICC = 0.72 and 0.64).
CONCLUSION: Intratumor heterogeneity, although present at the level of individual gene expression, does not preclude precise microarray-based predictions of tumor behavior or clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20368555      PMCID: PMC2860437          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

1.  Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Roman Rouzier; Charles M Perou; W Fraser Symmans; Nuhad Ibrahim; Massimo Cristofanilli; Keith Anderson; Kenneth R Hess; James Stec; Mark Ayers; Peter Wagner; Paolo Morandi; Chang Fan; Islam Rabiul; Jeffrey S Ross; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms.

Authors:  Rafael A Irizarry; Daniel Warren; Forrest Spencer; Irene F Kim; Shyam Biswal; Bryan C Frank; Edward Gabrielson; Joe G N Garcia; Joel Geoghegan; Gregory Germino; Constance Griffin; Sara C Hilmer; Eric Hoffman; Anne E Jedlicka; Ernest Kawasaki; Francisco Martínez-Murillo; Laura Morsberger; Hannah Lee; David Petersen; John Quackenbush; Alan Scott; Michael Wilson; Yanqin Yang; Shui Qing Ye; Wayne Yu
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms.

Authors:  Roger D Canales; Yuling Luo; James C Willey; Bradley Austermiller; Catalin C Barbacioru; Cecilie Boysen; Kathryn Hunkapiller; Roderick V Jensen; Charles R Knight; Kathleen Y Lee; Yunqing Ma; Botoul Maqsodi; Adam Papallo; Elizabeth Herness Peters; Karen Poulter; Patricia L Ruppel; Raymond R Samaha; Leming Shi; Wen Yang; Lu Zhang; Federico M Goodsaid
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Reproducibility of gene expression signature-based predictions in replicate experiments.

Authors:  Keith Anderson; Kenneth R Hess; Mini Kapoor; Stephen Tirrell; Jean Courtemanche; Bailiang Wang; Yun Wu; Yun Gong; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  HER2 testing by local, central, and reference laboratories in specimens from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 intergroup adjuvant trial.

Authors:  Edith A Perez; Vera J Suman; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Peter A Kaufman; Wilma L Lingle; Patrick J Flynn; James N Ingle; Daniel Visscher; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Expression profiling of gastric cancer samples by oligonucleotide microarray analysis reveals low degree of intra-tumor variability.

Authors:  Karolin Trautmann; Christine Steudel; Dana Grossmann; Daniela Aust; Gerhard Ehninger; Stephan Miehlke; Christian Thiede
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival.

Authors:  Lance D Miller; Johanna Smeds; Joshy George; Vinsensius B Vega; Liza Vergara; Alexander Ploner; Yudi Pawitan; Per Hall; Sigrid Klaar; Edison T Liu; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sources of variation in Affymetrix microarray experiments.

Authors:  Stanislav O Zakharkin; Kyoungmi Kim; Tapan Mehta; Lang Chen; Stephen Barnes; Katherine E Scheirer; Rudolph S Parrish; David B Allison; Grier P Page
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Gene expression profiling spares early breast cancer patients from adjuvant therapy: derived and validated in two population-based cohorts.

Authors:  Yudi Pawitan; Judith Bjöhle; Lukas Amler; Anna-Lena Borg; Suzanne Egyhazi; Per Hall; Xia Han; Lars Holmberg; Fei Huang; Sigrid Klaar; Edison T Liu; Lance Miller; Hans Nordgren; Alexander Ploner; Kerstin Sandelin; Peter M Shaw; Johanna Smeds; Lambert Skoog; Sara Wedrén; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  45 in total

1.  Heterogeneous Enhancement Patterns of Tumor-adjacent Parenchyma at MR Imaging Are Associated with Dysregulated Signaling Pathways and Poor Survival in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Bailiang Li; Xiaoli Sun; Guohong Cao; Daniel L Rubin; Sandy Napel; Debra M Ikeda; Allison W Kurian; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The therapeutic response of ER+/HER2- breast cancers differs according to the molecular Basal or Luminal subtype.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Anthony Goncalves; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-06

3.  "RADIOTRANSCRIPTOMICS": A synergy of imaging and transcriptomics in clinical assessment.

Authors:  Amal Katrib; William Hsu; Alex Bui; Yi Xing
Journal:  Quant Biol       Date:  2016-03-04

4.  Unsupervised Clustering of Quantitative Image Phenotypes Reveals Breast Cancer Subtypes with Distinct Prognoses and Molecular Pathways.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Yi Cui; Xiaoli Sun; Guohong Cao; Bailiang Li; Debra M Ikeda; Allison W Kurian; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Empirical chemosensitivity testing in a spheroid model of ovarian cancer using a microfluidics-based multiplex platform.

Authors:  Tamal Das; Liliane Meunier; Laurent Barbe; Diane Provencher; Olivier Guenat; Thomas Gervais; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  The need to examine metastatic tissue at the time of progression of breast cancer: is re-biopsy a necessity or a luxury?

Authors:  Mustafa Khasraw; Edi Brogi; Andrew D Seidman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Effects of tissue handling on RNA integrity and microarray measurements from resected breast cancers.

Authors:  Christos Hatzis; Hongxia Sun; Hui Yao; Rebekah E Hubbard; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Gildy V Babiera; Yun Wu; Lajos Pusztai; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  A serum protein profile predictive of the resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced breast cancers.

Authors:  Seok-Won Hyung; Min Young Lee; Jong-Han Yu; Byunghee Shin; Hee-Jung Jung; Jong-Moon Park; Wonshik Han; Kyung-Min Lee; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Hui Zhang; Ruedi Aebersold; Daehee Hwang; Sang-Won Lee; Myeong-Hee Yu; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Three-dimensional mRNA measurements reveal minimal regional heterogeneity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wusheng Yan; Joanna Shih; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Michael A Tangrea; Audrey Player; Lixia Diao; Nan Hu; Alisa M Goldstein; Jing Wang; Philip R Taylor; Scott M Lippman; Ignacio I Wistuba; Michael R Emmert-Buck; Heidi S Erickson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Affects Gene Expression Profile Test Prognostic Risk Stratification in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rekha Gyanchandani; Yan Lin; Hui-Min Lin; Kristine Cooper; Daniel P Normolle; Adam Brufsky; Michael Fastuca; Whitney Crosson; Steffi Oesterreich; Nancy E Davidson; Rohit Bhargava; David J Dabbs; Adrian V Lee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.