PURPOSE: Identifying sources of variation in expression microarray data and the effect of variance in gene expression measurements on complex predictive and diagnostic models is essential when translating microarray-based experimental approaches into clinical assays. The technical reproducibility of microarray platforms is well established. Here, we investigate the additional impact of intratumor heterogeneity, a largely unstudied component of variance, on the performance of several microarray-based assays in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Genome-wide expression profiling was performed on 50 core needle biopsies from 18 breast cancer patients using Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. Global profiles of expression were characterized using unsupervised clustering methods and variance components models. Array-based measures of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status were compared with immunohistochemistry. The precision of genomic predictors of ER pathway status, recurrence risk, and sensitivity to chemotherapeutics was evaluated by interclass correlation. RESULTS: Global patterns of gene expression demonstrated that intratumor variation was substantially less than the total variation observed across the patient population. Nevertheless, a fraction of genes exhibited significant intratumor heterogeneity in expression. A high degree of reproducibility was observed in single-gene predictors of ER (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.94) and PR expression (ICC = 0.90), and in a multigene predictor of ER pathway activation (ICC = 0.98) with high concordance with immunohistochemistry. Substantial agreement was also observed for multigene signatures of cancer recurrence (ICC = 0.71) and chemotherapeutic sensitivity (ICC = 0.72 and 0.64). CONCLUSION: Intratumor heterogeneity, although present at the level of individual gene expression, does not preclude precise microarray-based predictions of tumor behavior or clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.
PURPOSE: Identifying sources of variation in expression microarray data and the effect of variance in gene expression measurements on complex predictive and diagnostic models is essential when translating microarray-based experimental approaches into clinical assays. The technical reproducibility of microarray platforms is well established. Here, we investigate the additional impact of intratumor heterogeneity, a largely unstudied component of variance, on the performance of several microarray-based assays in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Genome-wide expression profiling was performed on 50 core needle biopsies from 18 breast cancerpatients using Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. Global profiles of expression were characterized using unsupervised clustering methods and variance components models. Array-based measures of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status were compared with immunohistochemistry. The precision of genomic predictors of ER pathway status, recurrence risk, and sensitivity to chemotherapeutics was evaluated by interclass correlation. RESULTS: Global patterns of gene expression demonstrated that intratumor variation was substantially less than the total variation observed across the patient population. Nevertheless, a fraction of genes exhibited significant intratumor heterogeneity in expression. A high degree of reproducibility was observed in single-gene predictors of ER (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.94) and PR expression (ICC = 0.90), and in a multigene predictor of ER pathway activation (ICC = 0.98) with high concordance with immunohistochemistry. Substantial agreement was also observed for multigene signatures of cancer recurrence (ICC = 0.71) and chemotherapeutic sensitivity (ICC = 0.72 and 0.64). CONCLUSION: Intratumor heterogeneity, although present at the level of individual gene expression, does not preclude precise microarray-based predictions of tumor behavior or clinical outcome in breast cancerpatients.
Authors: Roman Rouzier; Charles M Perou; W Fraser Symmans; Nuhad Ibrahim; Massimo Cristofanilli; Keith Anderson; Kenneth R Hess; James Stec; Mark Ayers; Peter Wagner; Paolo Morandi; Chang Fan; Islam Rabiul; Jeffrey S Ross; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rafael A Irizarry; Daniel Warren; Forrest Spencer; Irene F Kim; Shyam Biswal; Bryan C Frank; Edward Gabrielson; Joe G N Garcia; Joel Geoghegan; Gregory Germino; Constance Griffin; Sara C Hilmer; Eric Hoffman; Anne E Jedlicka; Ernest Kawasaki; Francisco Martínez-Murillo; Laura Morsberger; Hannah Lee; David Petersen; John Quackenbush; Alan Scott; Michael Wilson; Yanqin Yang; Shui Qing Ye; Wayne Yu Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Roger D Canales; Yuling Luo; James C Willey; Bradley Austermiller; Catalin C Barbacioru; Cecilie Boysen; Kathryn Hunkapiller; Roderick V Jensen; Charles R Knight; Kathleen Y Lee; Yunqing Ma; Botoul Maqsodi; Adam Papallo; Elizabeth Herness Peters; Karen Poulter; Patricia L Ruppel; Raymond R Samaha; Leming Shi; Wen Yang; Lu Zhang; Federico M Goodsaid Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Keith Anderson; Kenneth R Hess; Mini Kapoor; Stephen Tirrell; Jean Courtemanche; Bailiang Wang; Yun Wu; Yun Gong; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Edith A Perez; Vera J Suman; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Peter A Kaufman; Wilma L Lingle; Patrick J Flynn; James N Ingle; Daniel Visscher; Robert B Jenkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karolin Trautmann; Christine Steudel; Dana Grossmann; Daniela Aust; Gerhard Ehninger; Stephan Miehlke; Christian Thiede Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-10-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Lance D Miller; Johanna Smeds; Joshy George; Vinsensius B Vega; Liza Vergara; Alexander Ploner; Yudi Pawitan; Per Hall; Sigrid Klaar; Edison T Liu; Jonas Bergh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stanislav O Zakharkin; Kyoungmi Kim; Tapan Mehta; Lang Chen; Stephen Barnes; Katherine E Scheirer; Rudolph S Parrish; David B Allison; Grier P Page Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2005-08-29 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Yudi Pawitan; Judith Bjöhle; Lukas Amler; Anna-Lena Borg; Suzanne Egyhazi; Per Hall; Xia Han; Lars Holmberg; Fei Huang; Sigrid Klaar; Edison T Liu; Lance Miller; Hans Nordgren; Alexander Ploner; Kerstin Sandelin; Peter M Shaw; Johanna Smeds; Lambert Skoog; Sara Wedrén; Jonas Bergh Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Jia Wu; Yi Cui; Xiaoli Sun; Guohong Cao; Bailiang Li; Debra M Ikeda; Allison W Kurian; Ruijiang Li Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wusheng Yan; Joanna Shih; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Michael A Tangrea; Audrey Player; Lixia Diao; Nan Hu; Alisa M Goldstein; Jing Wang; Philip R Taylor; Scott M Lippman; Ignacio I Wistuba; Michael R Emmert-Buck; Heidi S Erickson Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Rekha Gyanchandani; Yan Lin; Hui-Min Lin; Kristine Cooper; Daniel P Normolle; Adam Brufsky; Michael Fastuca; Whitney Crosson; Steffi Oesterreich; Nancy E Davidson; Rohit Bhargava; David J Dabbs; Adrian V Lee Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 12.531