Literature DB >> 20364920

Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination.

Hsuan-Fu Chao1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the active inhibition of precued distractor locations. In this study, the distractor location was precued by an arrow. Experiment 1 indicated that a valid precue could facilitate target localization. Experiment 2 demonstrated that when conflict trials were included, the distractor precue benefit was eliminated. Experiment 3 further showed that active inhibition required time to operate. The distractor precue benefit was observed only when the stimulus onset asynchrony between the precue and the target and distractor display was long. Experiment 4 illustrated that the benefit was not contingent on precuing the distractor response. Experiment 5 indicated that the benefit of distractor precuing was not due to the activation of target locations, and Experiment 6 showed that this benefit was due to attentional inhibition. Finally, Experiment 7 demonstrated that active inhibition of spatial location required an attentional resource to operate. These results indicated how a top-down mechanism exerted control on distractor locations. Copyright 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20364920     DOI: 10.1037/a0015790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Goal-directed action is automatically biased towards looming motion.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Jonathan Sit; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.

Authors:  MaryAnn P Noonan; Nika Adamian; Alexandra Pike; Frida Printzlau; Ben M Crittenden; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Strategic Distractor Suppression Improves Selective Control in Human Vision.

Authors:  Wieske van Zoest; Christoph Huber-Huber; Matthew D Weaver; Clayton Hickey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Inhibition in selective attention.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.691

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.