Literature DB >> 20362383

Non-technical skills for obstetricians conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries: qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings.

Rachna Bahl1, Deirdre J Murphy, Bryony Strachan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Non-technical skills are cognitive and social skills required in an operational task. These skills have been identified and taught in the surgical domain but are of particular relevance to obstetrics where the patient is awake, the partner is present and the clinical circumstances are acute and often stressful. The aim of this study was to define the non-technical skills of an operative vaginal delivery (forceps or vacuum) to facilitate transfer of skills from expert obstetricians to trainee obstetricians. STUDY
DESIGN: Qualitative study using interviews and video recordings. The study was conducted at two university teaching hospitals (St. Michael's Hospital, Bristol and Ninewells Hospital, Dundee). Participants included 10 obstetricians and eight midwives identified as experts in conducting or supporting operative vaginal deliveries. Semi-structured interviews were carried out using routine clinical scenarios. The experts were also video recorded conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries in a simulation setting. The interviews and video recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic coding. The anonymised data were independently coded by the three researchers and then compared for consistency of interpretation. The experts reviewed the coded data for respondent validation and clarification. The themes that emerged were used to identify the non-technical skills required for conducting an operative vaginal delivery.
RESULTS: The final skills list was classified into seven main categories. Four categories (situational awareness, decision making, task management, and team work and communication) were similar to the categories identified in surgery. Three further categories unique to obstetrics were also identified (professional relationship with the woman, maintaining professional behaviour and cross-monitoring of performance).
CONCLUSION: This explicitly defined skills taxonomy could aid trainees' understanding of the non-technical skills to be considered when conducting an operative vaginal delivery and potentially reduce morbidity and improve the experience of delivery for the mother. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362383     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

1.  An international assessment of trainee experience, confidence, and comfort in operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  D A Crosby; A Sarangapani; A Simpson; R Windrim; A Satkunaratnam; M F Higgins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Is it Time to Rejuvenate the Forceps?

Authors:  Sanchila Talukdar; Nikhil Purandare; Sam Coulter-Smith; Michael Geary
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-08-13

3.  Decision-making approaches for children with life-limiting conditions: results from a qualitative phenomenological study.

Authors:  Sidharth Vemuri; Jenny Hynson; Katrina Williams; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.834

4.  Conceptualising paediatric advance care planning: a qualitative phenomenological study of paediatricians caring for children with life-limiting conditions in Australia.

Authors:  Sidharth Vemuri; Jenny Hynson; Katrina Williams; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  A prospective cohort study of the morbidity associated with operative vaginal deliveries performed by day and at night.

Authors:  Katherine Butler; Meenakshi Ramphul; Clare Dunney; Maria Farren; Aoife McSweeney; Karen McNamara; Deirdre J Murphy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Training and expertise in undertaking assisted vaginal delivery (AVD): a mixed methods systematic review of practitioners views and experiences.

Authors:  Claire Feeley; Nicola Crossland; Ana Pila Betran; Andrew Weeks; Soo Downe; Carol Kingdon
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Women's, partners' and healthcare providers' views and experiences of assisted vaginal birth: a systematic mixed methods review.

Authors:  Nicola Crossland; Carol Kingdon; Marie-Clare Balaam; Ana Pilar Betrán; Soo Downe
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Comparison of a practice-based versus theory-based training program for conducting vacuum-assisted deliveries: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Julian Marschalek; Lorenz Kuessel; Maria Stammler-Safar; Herbert Kiss; Johannes Ott; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.344

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.