Literature DB >> 20362329

Cell contraction forces in scaffolds with varying pore size and cell density.

Karolina A Corin1, Lorna J Gibson.   

Abstract

The contractile behavior of cells is relevant in understanding wound healing and scar formation. In tissue engineering, inhibition of the cell contractile response is critical for the regeneration of physiologically normal tissue rather than scar tissue. Previous studies have measured the contractile response of cells in a variety of conditions (e.g. on two-dimensional solid substrates, on free-floating tissue engineering scaffolds and on scaffolds under some constraint in a cell force monitor). Tissue engineering scaffolds behave mechanically like open-cell elastomeric foams: between strains of about 10 and 90%, cells progressively buckle struts in the scaffold. The contractile force required for an individual cell to buckle a strut within a scaffold has been estimated based on the strut dimensions (radius, r, and length, l) and the strut modulus, E(s). Since the buckling force varies, according to Euler's law, with r(4)/l(2), and the relative density of the scaffold varies as (r/l)(2), the cell contractile force associated with strut buckling is expected to vary with the square of the pore size for scaffolds of constant relative density. As the cell density increases, the force per cell to achieve a given strain in the scaffold is expected to decrease. Here we model the contractile response of fibroblasts by analyzing the response of a single tetrakaidecahedron to forces applied to individual struts (simulating cell contractile forces) using finite element analysis. We model tetrakaidecahedra of different strut lengths, corresponding to different scaffold pore sizes, and of varying numbers of loaded struts, corresponding to varying cell densities. We compare our numerical model with the results of free-floating contraction experiments of normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) in collagen-GAG scaffolds of varying pore size and with varying cell densities. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362329      PMCID: PMC2860620          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  34 in total

1.  Evidence for sequential utilization of fibronectin, vitronectin, and collagen during fibroblast-mediated collagen contraction.

Authors:  Kamaljit K Sethi; Ioannis V Yannas; Vivek Mudera; Mark Eastwood; Clive McFarland; Robert A Brown
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force.

Authors:  John L Tan; Joe Tien; Dana M Pirone; Darren S Gray; Kiran Bhadriraju; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds.

Authors:  F J O'Brien; B A Harley; I V Yannas; L J Gibson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata.

Authors:  K Burton; D L Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Quantitative analysis of collagen gel contractile forces generated by dermal fibroblasts and the relationship to cell morphology.

Authors:  M Eastwood; R Porter; U Khan; G McGrouther; R Brown
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.384

6.  Fibroblast traction as a mechanism for collagen morphogenesis.

Authors:  A K Harris; D Stopak; P Wild
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion.

Authors:  A K Harris; P Wild; D Stopak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds.

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; Brendan A Harley; Ioannis V Yannas; Lorna Gibson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes.

Authors:  J Lee; M Leonard; T Oliver; A Ishihara; K Jacobson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Isometric contraction by fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tissue culture: a quantitative study.

Authors:  M S Kolodney; R B Wysolmerski
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  15 in total

1.  Multiscale mechanical simulations of cell compacted collagen gels.

Authors:  Maziar Aghvami; V H Barocas; E A Sander
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Gradual conversion of cellular stress patterns into pre-stressed matrix architecture during in vitro tissue growth.

Authors:  Cécile M Bidan; Philip Kollmannsberger; Vanessa Gering; Sebastian Ehrig; Pascal Joly; Ansgar Petersen; Viola Vogel; Peter Fratzl; John W C Dunlop
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Methodologies in creating skin substitutes.

Authors:  Mathew N Nicholas; Marc G Jeschke; Saeid Amini-Nik
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Investigating the interplay between substrate stiffness and ligand chemistry in directing mesenchymal stem cell differentiation within 3D macro-porous substrates.

Authors:  Matthew G Haugh; Ted J Vaughan; Christopher M Madl; Rosanne M Raftery; Laoise M McNamara; Fergal J O'Brien; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  3D Printing of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration Applications.

Authors:  Anh-Vu Do; Behnoush Khorsand; Sean M Geary; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  Integrating Concepts of Material Mechanics, Ligand Chemistry, Dimensionality and Degradation to Control Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Matthew G Haugh; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 11.354

7.  Fabrication of anatomically-shaped cartilage constructs using decellularized cartilage-derived matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Christopher R Rowland; Lina A Colucci; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Acellular Urethra Bioscaffold: Decellularization of Whole Urethras for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Irina N Simões; Paulo Vale; Shay Soker; Anthony Atala; Daniel Keller; Rute Noiva; Sandra Carvalho; Conceição Peleteiro; Joaquim M S Cabral; Daniel Eberli; Cláudia L da Silva; Pedro M Baptista
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The effect of collagen hydrogels on chondrocyte behaviors through restricting the contraction of cell/hydrogel constructs.

Authors:  Longpeng Dong; Qingli Liu; Yongli Gao; Hengxing Jia; Wenling Dai; Likun Guo; Hongsong Fan; Yujiang Fan; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-07-01

10.  Novel biodegradable porous scaffold applied to skin regeneration.

Authors:  Hui-Min Wang; Yi-Ting Chou; Zhi-Hong Wen; Chau-Zen Wang; Zhao-Ren Wang; Chun-Hong Chen; Mei-Ling Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.