| Literature DB >> 20361031 |
Judd L Walson1, Barclay T Stewart, Laura Sangaré, Loice W Mbogo, Phelgona A Otieno, Benjamin K S Piper, Barbra A Richardson, Grace John-Stewart.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deworming HIV-1 infected individuals may delay HIV-1 disease progression. It is important to determine the prevalence and correlates of HIV-1/helminth co-infection in helminth-endemic areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20361031 PMCID: PMC2846937 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1CONSORT flowchart of study screening and enrollment.
Figure 2Geographic distribution and prevalence of helminth infection by species and screening region in Kenya.
The black dots represent the relative locations of the ten sites where screening occurred. The number of individuals screened (and percent of total) in each region is listed. The prevalence of helminth infection in each region is listed below in bold. The number of infections for each species and column percents are shown for each region.
Correlates of helminth infection among HIV-1 seropositive adults in Kenya.
| Characteristic | n | Helminth Infected (n = 298) | Helminth Uninfected (n = 1243) | RR (95% CI) |
| Age (years); mean (SD) | 1488 | 34.4 (9.5) | 35.7 (9.3) | 0.88 (0.78, 1.00) |
| Gender; n (%) | ||||
| Male | 382 | 63 (22.3) | 319 (26.3) | Reference |
| Female | 1114 | 220 (77.7) | 894 (73.7) | 1.20 (0.93, 1.54) |
| Site; n (%) | ||||
| Nairobi (urban) | 689 | 101 (33.9) | 588 (47.3) | Reference |
| Greater-Nairobi (peri-urban) | 427 | 74 (24.8) | 358 (28.4) | 1.18 (0.90, 1.56) |
| Western (rural) | 213 | 62 (20.8) | 151 (12.1) | 1.99 (1.51, 2.62) |
| Costal (rural) | 212 | 61 (20.5) | 151 (12.2) | 1.96 (1.49, 2.59) |
| Education; n (%) | ||||
| None | 132 | 38 (14.1) | 94 (7.9) | 1.90 (1.34, 2.69) |
| Primary | 782 | 153 (56.7) | 629 (53.2) | 1.29 (0.99), 1.68) |
| Secondary | 449 | 68 (25.2) | 381 (32.2) | Reference |
| Post-secondary | 89 | 11 (4.1) | 78 (6.8) | 0.82 (0.45, 1.48) |
| Water source; n (%) | ||||
| Piped water in home | 182 | 21 (7.5) | 161 (13.4) | Reference |
| Communal water source | 800 | 141 (50.2) | 659 (54.8) | 1.52 (0.99, 2.35) |
| Lake, river or pool | 239 | 67 (23.8) | 172 (14.3) | 2.43 (1.55, 3.81) |
| Other | 263 | 52 (18.5) | 211 (17.5) | 1.71 (1.07, 2.74) |
| Sanitation; n (%) | ||||
| Access to flush toilet | 296 | 34 (12.1) | 262 (21.6) | Reference |
| No toilet or latrine | 95 | 37 (13.2) | 58 (4.8) | 3.39 (2.26, 5.08) |
| Pit latrine for single home | 491 | 112 (39.9) | 379 (31.3) | 1.99 (1.40, 2.83) |
| Shared pit latrine | 610 | 98 (34.9) | 512 (42.3) | 1.40 (0.97, 2.01) |
| Employment; n (%) | ||||
| Employed, non-farmer | 767 | 125 (44.3) | 642 (53.2) | Reference |
| Employed, farmer | 263 | 68 (24.1) | 195 (16.1) | 1.59 (1.22, 2.06) |
| Not employed | 460 | 89 (31.6) | 371 (30.7) | 1.19 (0.93, 1.52) |
| CD4 count (cells/µL); n (%) | ||||
| 0 – 349 | 372 | 81 (30.3) | 291 (40.8) | Reference |
| ≥350 | 608 | 186 (69.7) | 422 (59.2) | 1.40 (1.12, 1.76) |
*: Comparisons by years in decades.
Risk of helminth infection by household development index (HDI).
| HDI level | Soil-transmitted helminth (N = 264) |
| ||
| % | RR (95% CI) | % | RR (95% CI) | |
| Level 1 | 2.3 | Reference | 4.8 | Reference |
| Level 2 | 68.6 | 2.20 (1.01, 4.79) | 76.2 | 1.31 (0.18, 9.74) |
| Level 3 | 29.2 | 2.58 (1.17, 5.70) | 19.1 | 0.95 (0.11, 8.34) |
Household development levels are defined as: Level 1 (most developed) participant has access to a flush toilet in home, water piped into their house, an income generating occupation, and has completed, at least, secondary school; Level 2 participant lacks one, two or three of access to a flush toilet, water piped into their home, an income generating occupation, and a secondary education; Level 3 (least developed) participant lacks four of the above.
Relative risk of species-specific helminth infection associated with study correlates among HIV-1 seropositive adults in Kenya, compared to helminth-uninfected individuals.
| Correlate | Hookworm sp. (n = 168) RR (95% CI) |
|
|
| Mixed (n = 28) RR (95% CI) |
| Rural vs. urban residence | 2.40 (1.81–3.17) |
|
|
| 2.63 (1.27–5.47) |
| Increasing age in decades | 0.78 (0.66–0.94) |
|
| 1.58 (1.08–2.30) | 0.59 (0.36–0.97) |
| Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
| Greater-Nairobi vs. Nairobi |
|
|
| 6.48 (1.84–22.8) |
|
| Western vs. Nairobi | 2.36 (1.58–3.51) | 2.10 (1.09–4.07) |
| 7.53 (1.90–29.8) |
|
| Coastal vs. Nairobi | 2.83 (1.95–4.09) |
|
|
| 2.74 (1.12–6.70) |
| None vs. secondary education | 2.22 (1.38–3.58) |
| 2.92 (1.04–8.22) |
| 7.82 (1.45–42.0) |
| Environmental vs. piped water | 3.40 (1.61–7.16) |
|
|
|
|
| Communal vs. piped water | 2.46 (1.22–4.98) |
|
|
|
|
| No toilet vs. flush | 5.08 (2.90–8.90) |
|
|
| 8.28 (2.13–32.2) |
| Pit latrine vs. flush | 2.17 (1.30–3.66) |
|
|
|
|
| Farmer vs. non-farmer |
| 2.02 (1.05–3.88) |
| 8.62 (2.78–26.8) | 2.82 (1.03–7.67) |
| CD4 0-349 vs. ≥350 cells/µL | 1.50 (1.10–2.05) |
|
|
|
|
*: Non-statistically significant relative risk.
Figure 3Median CD4 count and plasma HIV RNA level by helminth species.
aNo HIV RNA data were available for S. stercoralis or S. mansoni. The study aimed to recruit pre-HAART individuals with CD4 counts greater than 250 cells. Participants were allowed to give CD4 count measurements from their prior HIV Care and Treatment Clinic visit if it fell within three months of the screening date. However, when these CD4 counts were confirmed, many people had lower CD4 counts than recorded by history. Eighty-nine participants had CD4 counts between 0–199 cells/µL3 and 256 participants had CD4 counts between 200–349 cells/µL3.
Figure 4Species-specific helminth infection twelve weeks after albendazole or placebo treatment.
1Total number of individuals with follow-up stool available, stratified by species of initial infection and treatment arm. ALB, albendazole; PLC, placebo.