Literature DB >> 2035948

Comprehensive predictions of outcome in closed head-injured patients. The development of prognostic equations.

R W Thatcher1, D S Cantor, R McAlaster, F Geisler, P Krause.   

Abstract

A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation was administered to 162 closed head-injured patients within 1 to 21 days (mean, 7.5 days) after injury. Each evaluation consisted of (1) power spectral analyses of electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded from 19 scalp locations referenced to age-matched norms, (2) brainstem auditory evoked potentials, (3) computed tomography (CT)-scan, and (4) Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) at time of admission (GCS-A) and at time of EEG test (GCS-T). Functional outcome at one year following injury was assessed using the Rappaport Disability Rating Scale (DRS), which measures the level of disability in the six diagnostic categories of (1) eye opening, (2) best verbal response, (3) best motor response, (4) self-care ability for feeding, grooming, and toileting, (5) level of cognitive functioning, and (6) employability. The ability of the different diagnostic measures to predict outcome at one year following injury was assessed using stepwise discriminant analyses to identify patients in the extreme outcome categories of complete recovery versus death and multivariate regression analyses to predict patients with intermediate outcome scores. The best combination of predictor variables was EEG and GCS-T, which accounted for 74.6% of the variance in the multivariate regression analysis of intermediate outcome scores and 95.8% discriminant accuracy between good outcome and death. The best single predictors of outcome in both the discriminant analyses and the regression analyses were EEG coherence and phase. A gradient of prognostic strength of diagnostic measures was EEG phase greater than EEG coherence greater than GCS-T greater than CT-scan greater than EEG relative power. The value of EEG coherence and phase in the assessment of diffuse axonal injury was discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2035948     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb51576.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  8 in total

1.  Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) and neuropsychological syndrome analysis.

Authors:  B V Shenal; R D Rhodes; T M Moore; D A Higgins; D W Harrison
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 2.  A Review of the Effectiveness of Neuroimaging Modalities for the Detection of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Franck Amyot; David B Arciniegas; Michael P Brazaitis; Kenneth C Curley; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Amir Gandjbakhche; Peter Herscovitch; Sidney R Hinds; Geoffrey T Manley; Anthony Pacifico; Alexander Razumovsky; Jason Riley; Wanda Salzer; Robert Shih; James G Smirniotopoulos; Derek Stocker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Traumatic brain injury detection using electrophysiological methods.

Authors:  Paul E Rapp; David O Keyser; Alfonso Albano; Rene Hernandez; Douglas B Gibson; Robert A Zambon; W David Hairston; John D Hughes; Andrew Krystal; Andrew S Nichols
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Investigating the validity and reliability of Electrovestibulography (EVestG) for detecting post-concussion syndrome (PCS) with and without comorbid depression.

Authors:  Abdelbaset Suleiman; Brian Lithgow; Behzad Mansouri; Zahra Moussavi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Recovery of Theta Frequency Oscillations in Rats Following Lateral Fluid Percussion Corresponds With a Mild Cognitive Phenotype.

Authors:  Katelynn Ondek; Aleksandr Pevzner; Kayleen Tercovich; Amber M Schedlbauer; Ali Izadi; Arne D Ekstrom; Stephen L Cowen; Kiarash Shahlaie; Gene G Gurkoff
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  May clinical neurophysiology help to predict the recovery of neurological early rehabilitation patients?

Authors:  Jens D Rollnik
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 7.  Making Waves in the Brain: What Are Oscillations, and Why Modulating Them Makes Sense for Brain Injury.

Authors:  Aleksandr Pevzner; Ali Izadi; Darrin J Lee; Kiarash Shahlaie; Gene G Gurkoff
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 8.  A Framework to Advance Biomarker Development in the Diagnosis, Outcome Prediction, and Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Wilde; Ina-Beate Wanner; Kimbra Kenney; Jessica Gill; James R Stone; Seth Disner; Caroline Schnakers; Retsina Meyer; Eric M Prager; Magali Haas; Andreas Jeromin
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.269

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.