Literature DB >> 20358410

Osteolysis in well-functioning fixed- and mobile-bearing TKAs in younger patients.

Young-Hoo Kim1, Yoowang Choi, Jun-Shik Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic osteolysis is an increasingly prevalent complication of TKA. To reduce the polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis, particularly in young patients, the design of the contemporary fixed-bearing TKAs has been modified and mobile-bearing TKAs have been introduced. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether the prevalence of osteolysis would be less in well-functioning mobile-bearing TKAs than in well-functioning contemporary fixed-bearing TKAs in young patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 488 patients (894 knees) who received fixed-bearing knee prostheses with 445 patients (816 knees) who received mobile-bearing knee prostheses. There were 187 men and 301 women (mean age, 58.6 years; range, 33-65 years) in the fixed-bearing group and 167 men and 278 women (mean age, 55.7 years; range, 33-65 years) in the mobile-bearing group. The mean followup was 12.6 years (range, 10-17 years) in the fixed-bearing group and 12.9 years (range, 10-17 years) in the mobile-bearing group.
RESULTS: The incidence of osteolysis was 1.6% (14 of 894 knees) in the fixed-bearing group and 2.2% (18 of 816 knees) in the mobile-bearing group at the final review. The mean postoperative Knee Society knee and function scores were 92.9 points and 83.5 points, respectively, in the fixed-bearing group and 90.7 points and 83.8 points, respectively, in the mobile-bearing group. The revision rates were 3.7% (33 of 894 knees) in the fixed-bearing group and 2.7% (22 of 816 knees) in the mobile-bearing group.
CONCLUSIONS: We found the incidence of osteolysis, rate of revision, and implant survivorship were similar between fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing TKAs in younger patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20358410      PMCID: PMC2947690          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1336-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  Midterm results of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years.

Authors:  R B Sorrells; J B Stiehl; P E Voorhorst
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the knee.

Authors:  J P Collier; D K Sperling; J H Currier; L C Sutula; K A Saum; M B Mayor
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Effect of component fixation method on osteolysis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K A Ezzet; R Garcia; R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement.

Authors:  S A Mikulak; O M Mahoney; M A dela Rosa; T P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome.

Authors:  D R Diduch; J N Insall; W N Scott; G R Scuderi; D Font-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Osteolysis around cementless porous-coated anatomic knee prostheses.

Authors:  Y H Kim; J H Oh; S H Oh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-03

7.  Osteolysis of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Cadambi; G A Engh; K A Dwyer; T N Vinh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Catastrophic osteolysis in total knee replacement. A report of 17 cases.

Authors:  E J Robinson; B D Mulliken; R B Bourne; C H Rorabeck; C Alvarez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients 55 years old or younger. 10- to 17-year results.

Authors:  G P Duffy; R T Trousdale; M J Stuart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Adventures in mobile-bearing knee design: a mid-life crisis.

Authors:  J N Insall
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Arthroplasty in young adults: options, techniques, trends, and results.

Authors:  Bharat S Mody; Kshitij Mody
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

Review 3.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Combined unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Marco Tinius; Pierre Hepp; Roland Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Long-term follow-up of a non-randomised prospective cohort of one hundred and ninety two total knee arthroplasties using the NexGen implant.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Franceso Falez; Rocco D'Apolito; Katia Corona; Carlo Perisano; Michele Vasso
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Hyung-Mook Lim; Eun-Soo Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Radek Wojtowicz; Kjell G Nilsson; Sead Crnalic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements.

Authors:  Oystein Gothesen; Stein Hakon L Lygre; Michelle Lorimer; Stephen Graves; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Similar outcomes including maximum knee flexion between mobile bearing condylar-stabilised and fixed bearing posterior-stabilised prosthesis: a case control study.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Moussa Kafelov; Stanislas Gunst; Cécile Batailler; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-02-15

10.  Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Sung-Hwan Yoon; Jang-Won Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.