INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that knowing the morphology of carotid atheroma improves current risk stratification for predicting subsequent thrombo-embolic events. Previous magnetic resonance (MR) ex vivo studies have shown that diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can detect lipid-rich necrotic core (LR/NC) and fibrous cap. This study aims to establish if this is achievable in vivo. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (mean age 73 years, range 54-87 years) with moderate to severe carotid stenosis confirmed on ultrasound were imaged. An echo-planar DWI sequence was performed along with standard high-resolution MR imaging. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were evaluated. Two independent readers reported the mean ADC values from regions of interest defining LR/NCs and fibrous caps. For subjects undergoing carotid endarterectomy (n = 19), carotid specimens were obtained and stained using Nile red. RESULTS: The mean ADC values were 1.0 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (±SD 0.3 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and 0.7 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (±SD 0.2 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) for fibrous cap and LR/NC, respectively; the difference was significant (p < 0.0001). The intra-class correlation coefficients summarising the agreement between the two independent readers were 0.84 and 0.60 for fibrous cap and LR/NC, respectively. Comparison of quantitative ADC values and histology (by subjective grading of lipid content) showed a significant correlation: heavier lipid staining matched lower ADC values (r = -0.435, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that DWI can be used to distinguish LR/NC and the fibrous cap. The study also suggests that the mean ADC value may be linearly related to subjective graded LR/NC content determined by histology.
INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that knowing the morphology of carotid atheroma improves current risk stratification for predicting subsequent thrombo-embolic events. Previous magnetic resonance (MR) ex vivo studies have shown that diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can detect lipid-rich necrotic core (LR/NC) and fibrous cap. This study aims to establish if this is achievable in vivo. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (mean age 73 years, range 54-87 years) with moderate to severe carotid stenosis confirmed on ultrasound were imaged. An echo-planar DWI sequence was performed along with standard high-resolution MR imaging. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were evaluated. Two independent readers reported the mean ADC values from regions of interest defining LR/NCs and fibrous caps. For subjects undergoing carotid endarterectomy (n = 19), carotid specimens were obtained and stained using Nile red. RESULTS: The mean ADC values were 1.0 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (±SD 0.3 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and 0.7 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (±SD 0.2 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) for fibrous cap and LR/NC, respectively; the difference was significant (p < 0.0001). The intra-class correlation coefficients summarising the agreement between the two independent readers were 0.84 and 0.60 for fibrous cap and LR/NC, respectively. Comparison of quantitative ADC values and histology (by subjective grading of lipid content) showed a significant correlation: heavier lipid staining matched lower ADC values (r = -0.435, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that DWI can be used to distinguish LR/NC and the fibrous cap. The study also suggests that the mean ADC value may be linearly related to subjective graded LR/NC content determined by histology.
Authors: Rikin A Trivedi; Jean-Marie U-King-Im; Martin J Graves; Jo Horsley; Martin Goddard; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Xue-Qiao Zhao; Binh An P Phan; Baocheng Chu; Frank Bray; Andrew B Moore; Nayak L Polissar; J Theodore Dodge; Colin D Lee; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: X Q Zhao; C Yuan; T S Hatsukami; E H Frechette; X J Kang; K R Maravilla; B G Brown Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: William S Kerwin; Kevin D O'Brien; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Bruce A Wasserman; William I Smith; Hugh H Trout; Richard O Cannon; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronald van 't Klooster; Andrew J Patterson; Victoria E Young; Jonathan H Gillard; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 3.240