INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potentialities of a semi-automated technique in the detection and measurement of the carotid artery plaque. METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients (18 males, 4 females; mean age 62 years) examined with MDCTA from January 2011 to March 2011 were included in this retrospective study. Carotid arteries are examined with a 16-multi-detector-row CT system, and for each patient, the most diseased carotid was selected. In the first phase, the carotid plaque was identified and one experienced radiologist manually traced the inner and outer boundaries by using polyline and radial distance method (PDM and RDM, respectively). In the second phase, the carotid inner and outer boundaries were traced with an automated algorithm: level-set-method (LSM). Data were compared by using Pearson rho correlation, Bland-Altman, and regression. RESULTS: A total of 715 slices were analyzed. The mean thickness of the plaque using the reference PDM was 1.86 mm whereas using the LSM-PDM was 1.96 mm; using the reference RDM was 2.06 mm whereas using the LSM-RDM was 2.03 mm. The correlation values between the references, the LSM, the PDM and the RDM were 0.8428, 0.9921, 0.745 and 0.6425. Bland-Altman demonstrated a very good agreement in particular with the RDM method. CONCLUSION: Results of our study indicate that LSM method can automatically measure the thickness of the plaque and that the best results are obtained with the RDM. Our results suggest that advanced computer-based algorithms can identify and trace the plaque boundaries like an experienced human reader.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potentialities of a semi-automated technique in the detection and measurement of the carotid artery plaque. METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients (18 males, 4 females; mean age 62 years) examined with MDCTA from January 2011 to March 2011 were included in this retrospective study. Carotid arteries are examined with a 16-multi-detector-row CT system, and for each patient, the most diseased carotid was selected. In the first phase, the carotid plaque was identified and one experienced radiologist manually traced the inner and outer boundaries by using polyline and radial distance method (PDM and RDM, respectively). In the second phase, the carotid inner and outer boundaries were traced with an automated algorithm: level-set-method (LSM). Data were compared by using Pearson rho correlation, Bland-Altman, and regression. RESULTS: A total of 715 slices were analyzed. The mean thickness of the plaque using the reference PDM was 1.86 mm whereas using the LSM-PDM was 1.96 mm; using the reference RDM was 2.06 mm whereas using the LSM-RDM was 2.03 mm. The correlation values between the references, the LSM, the PDM and the RDM were 0.8428, 0.9921, 0.745 and 0.6425. Bland-Altman demonstrated a very good agreement in particular with the RDM method. CONCLUSION: Results of our study indicate that LSM method can automatically measure the thickness of the plaque and that the best results are obtained with the RDM. Our results suggest that advanced computer-based algorithms can identify and trace the plaque boundaries like an experienced human reader.
Authors: Evert F S van Velsen; Wiro J Niessen; Thomas T de Weert; Cécile de Monyé; Aad van der Lugt; Erik Meijering; Rik Stokking Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eric B Rosero; Ronald M Peshock; Amit Khera; G Patrick Clagett; Hao Lo; Carlos Timaran Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Thomas T de Weert; Mohamed Ouhlous; Pieter E Zondervan; Johanna M Hendriks; Diederik W J Dippel; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Aad van der Lugt Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-04-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Joseph R Leach; Vitaliy L Rayz; Bruno Soares; Max Wintermark; Mohammad R K Mofrad; David Saloner Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Mohamed Ouhlous; H Zwenneke Flach; Thomas T de Weert; Johanna M Hendriks; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Diederik W J Dippel; Peter M T Pattynama; Aad van der Lugt Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Danijela Vukadinovic; Theo van Walsum; Rashindra Manniesing; Sietske Rozie; Reinhard Hameeteman; Thomas T de Weert; Aad van der Lugt; Wiro J Niessen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Luca Saba; Pankaj K Jain; Harman S Suri; Nobutaka Ikeda; Tadashi Araki; Bikesh K Singh; Andrew Nicolaides; Shoaib Shafique; Ajay Gupta; John R Laird; Jasjit S Suri Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2017-05-13 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: U Rajendra Acharya; S Vinitha Sree; Sanjeev Kulshreshtha; Filippo Molinari; Joel En Wei Koh; Luca Saba; Jasjit S Suri Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-12-06