Literature DB >> 20358169

[Intubation-linked dental injuries. Relevance of individually adaptable tooth protection models].

E Monaca1, N Fock, M Doehn, M Winterhalter, F Wappler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tooth damage during anaesthesia could be reduced by using tooth protectors during endotracheal intubation. The effectiveness of different models was investigated using an upper jaw model.
METHOD: A total of 6 individual adaptable dental protectors (Endoragard and Camo, with wax or silicone filling, respectively, Beauty pink dental wax with and without tissue inserts) were examined in three different categories. The upper jaw was covered with each dental shield and then loaded with a force of 150 N via a blade of a laryngoscope. Subsequently, force reduction was measured in axial as well as horizontal directions. Furthermore, the reduction in oral view was determined by measuring the thickness of each dental shield with a micrometer.
RESULTS: The combination of Camo and silicone achieved the maximum horizontal force reduction value (39.2 N). Endoragard and silicone achieved the best axial value (21.6 N). Beauty pink wax had the thinnest dental shield (2.8 mm), whereas the combination of Camo and silicone gave the most limited view inside the oral cavity (3.8 mm).
CONCLUSION: Preformed dental shields are useful for reducing the force applied to the teeth and potentially reducing the probability of tooth damage during laryngoscopy. However, the shield with the highest force reduction capability is relatively large and expensive which makes general use almost impossible. The model Beauty pink was slightly less force reducing and could be considered as an inexpensive and yet effective tool for clinical assignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20358169     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-009-1670-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  21 in total

1.  Improved laryngoscope blade designed for ease of manipulation and reduction of trauma.

Authors:  D V BIZZARRI; J G GIUFFRIDA
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1958 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  The effectiveness of preformed tooth protectors during endotracheal intubation: an upper jaw model.

Authors:  Enrico Monaca; Norbert Fock; Manfred Doehn; Frank Wappler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Oral complications associated with endotracheal general anesthesia.

Authors:  J J Chen; L Susetio; C C Chao
Journal:  Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi       Date:  1990-06

4.  Dental injuries during general anaesthesia: can the dentist help the anaesthetist?

Authors:  R G Chadwick; S M Lindsay
Journal:  Dent Update       Date:  1998-03

Review 5.  Anesthesia-induced dental injury.

Authors:  M B Rosenberg
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  1989

6.  Incidence of oral tissue trauma after the administration of general anesthesia.

Authors:  B K Fung; M Y Chan
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Sin       Date:  2001-12

7.  [Tooth injuries during intubation: a new preventive device].

Authors:  C Magnin; E N Bory; J Motin
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  1991

8.  Dental damage during anaesthesia and surgery.

Authors:  J F Burton; A B Baker
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.669

9.  Forces acting on the maxillary incisor teeth during laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Authors:  M J Bucx; C J Snijders; R T van Geel; C Robers; H van de Giessen; W Erdmann; T Stijnen
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  A dental protector.

Authors:  L Agosti
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Anesthesia for medical students : A brief guide to practical anesthesia in adults with a web-based video illustration].

Authors:  S Mathis; O Schlafer; J Abram; J Kreutziger; P Paal; V Wenzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.