The progesterone receptor (PR) is estrogen regulated, and PR levels in breast tumors can be used to predict the success of endocrine therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ER). Tanaproget is a nonsteroidal progestin agonist with very high PR binding affinity and excellent in vivo potency. When appropriately radiolabeled, it might be used to image PR-positive breast tumors noninvasively by positron emission tomography (PET). We describe the synthesis and PR binding affinities of a series of fluoroalkyl-substituted 6-aryl-1,4-dihydrobenzo[d][1,3]oxazine-2-thiones, analogues of Tanaproget. Some of these compounds have subnanomolar binding affinities, higher than that of either Tanaproget itself or the high affinity PR ligand R5020. Structure-binding affinity relationships can be rationalized by molecular modeling of ligand complexes with PR, and the enantioselectivity of binding has been predicted. These compounds are being further evaluated as potential diagnostic PET imaging agents for breast cancer, and enantiomerically pure materials of defined stereochemistry are being prepared.
The progesterone receptor (n class="Gene">PR) is estrogen regulated, and PR levels in breast tumors can be used to predict the success of endocrine therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ER). Tanaproget is a nonsteroidal progestin agonist with very high PR binding affinity and excellent in vivo potency. When appropriately radiolabeled, it might be used to image PR-positive breast tumors noninvasively by positron emission tomography (PET). We describe the synthesis and PR binding affinities of a series of fluoroalkyl-substituted 6-aryl-1,4-dihydrobenzo[d][1,3]oxazine-2-thiones, analogues of Tanaproget. Some of these compounds have subnanomolar binding affinities, higher than that of either Tanaproget itself or the high affinity PR ligand R5020. Structure-binding affinity relationships can be rationalized by molecular modeling of ligand complexes with PR, and the enantioselectivity of binding has been predicted. These compounds are being further evaluated as potential diagnostic PET imaging agents for breast cancer, and enantiomerically pure materials of defined stereochemistry are being prepared.
Authors: Dong Zhou; Terry L Sharp; Nicole M Fettig; Hsiaoju Lee; Jason S Lewis; John A Katzenellenbogen; Michael J Welch Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Yu Dong; Jacques Y Roberge; Zhaoqing Wang; Xiaodong Wang; Joseph Tamasi; Vanessa Dell; Rajasree Golla; James R Corte; Yalei Liu; Tianan Fang; Monique N Anthony; Dora M Schnur; Michele L Agler; John K Dickson; R Michael Lawrence; Margaret M Prack; Ramakrishna Seethala; Jean H M Feyen Journal: Steroids Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Valerie-Jeanne Bardou; Grazia Arpino; Richard M Elledge; C Kent Osborne; Gary M Clark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Richard C Winneker; Andrew Fensome; Puwen Zhang; Matthew R Yudt; Casey C McComas; Rayomond J Unwalla Journal: Steroids Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Puwen Zhang; Eugene A Terefenko; Andrew Fensome; Jay Wrobel; Richard Winneker; Zhiming Zhang Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Preeti A Sukerkar; Keith W MacRenaris; Taryn R Townsend; Roshan A Ahmed; Joanna E Burdette; Thomas J Meade Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Lemonitsa H Mammatas; Henk M W Verheul; N Harry Hendrikse; Maqsood Yaqub; Adriaan A Lammertsma; C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Amy M Fowler; Amy S Clark; John A Katzenellenbogen; Hannah M Linden; Farrokh Dehdashti Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Louis Allott; Cecilia Miranda; Angela Hayes; Florence Raynaud; Christopher Cawthorne; Graham Smith Journal: EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem Date: 2019-01-10