Literature DB >> 20354734

Evaluation of analgesic effect and safety of fentanyl transdermal patch for cancer pain as the first line.

Yoshiyuki Hoya1, Tomoyoshi Okamoto, Katsuhiko Yanaga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial treatment with morphine followed by fentanyl transdermal patch is the standard in Japan, since even the smallest patch (2.5 mg) could deliver too high an initial dose for Japanese patients. We evaluated the analgesic effect and safety of using the fentanyl transdermal patch as a first-line strong opioid for cancer pain that is resistant to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 20 hospitalized patients with cancer pain that could not be controlled by NSAIDs, the fentanyl transdermal patch (1.25 mg; half of a 2.5-mg patch) was administered as a first-line strong opioid. We used rescue medications depending on the degree of pain, and the dose of fentanyl transdermal patch was adjusted every 3 days. To evaluate analgesic efficacy of the patch, the degree of pain was assessed twice a day, in the morning and at night, using a face rating scale. The formulation and dose of morphine used during observation period were recorded. The safety of treatment was evaluated by measuring vital signs once a day, and the severity of side effects were evaluated. Any abnormal findings in blood and urine test were recorded.
RESULTS: The median pain score before administration of fentanyl transdermal patch was 3 + or - 0.58 and was decreased to 2 + or - 0.71 on day 9 of administration. The mean dose of fentanyl transdermal patch on day 9 of administration was 2.31 + or - 1.34 mg, and the mean dose of morphine as rescue therapy was 4.62 + or - 7.76 mg. No clinically significant changes in vital signs were observed. No severe adverse events were present when the dose of the fentanyl transdermal patch was 1.25 mg, but two patients experienced dizziness when the dose was increased from 2.5 to 5 mg. No abnormal laboratory data appeared during the administration.
CONCLUSION: The use of 1.25-mg fentanyl transdermal patch (50% of a 2.5-mg patch) seems to be safe and efficient as a first-line strong opioid. The use of 3.75-mg fentanyl transdermal patch may be necessary since adverse events including nausea and sleepiness are likely to occur by increasing from 2.5 to 5 mg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354734     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0869-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  11 in total

1.  A STUDY OF SOME OF THE PHARMACOLOGIC ACTIONS OF FENTANYL CITRATE.

Authors:  J F GARDOCKI; J YELNOSKY
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Transdermal fentanyl for pain control in adults with chronic cancer pain.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Transdermal delivery of narcotic analgesics: comparative permeabilities of narcotic analgesics through human cadaver skin.

Authors:  S D Roy; G L Flynn
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained-release oral morphine in cancer pain: preference, efficacy, and quality of life. The TTS-Fentanyl Comparative Trial Group.

Authors:  S Ahmedzai; D Brooks
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  A clinical evaluation of transdermal therapeutic system fentanyl for the treatment of cancer pain.

Authors:  P A Sloan; D E Moulin; H Hays
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Comparison of TTS-fentanyl with sustained-release oral morphine in the treatment of patients not using opioids for mild-to-moderate pain.

Authors:  R van Seventer; J M Smit; R M Schipper; M A Wicks; W W A Zuurmond
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Long-term cancer pain management in morphine pre-treated and opioid naive patients with transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mystakidou; Eleni Tsilika; Efi Parpa; Vassilios Kouloulias; Ioannis Kouvaris; Stavroula Georgaki; Lambros Vlahos
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Granisetron vs dolasetron for acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in high and moderately high emetogenic chemotherapy: an open-label pilot study.

Authors:  Marianne Tan; Richard Xu; Rahul Seth
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and its newer derivatives.

Authors:  L E Mather
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1983 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Pain management of cancer patients with transdermal fentanyl: a study of 1828 step I, II, & III transfers.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mystakidou; Efi Parpa; Eleni Tsilika; Emmanuella Katsouda; Vassilios Kouloulias; John Kouvaris; Stavroula Georgaki; Lambros Vlahos
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.820

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reporting characteristics of cancer pain: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals.

Authors:  Senthil P Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2011-01

2.  Efficacy of fentanyl transdermal patch in the treatment of chronic soft tissue cancer pain.

Authors:  Karim Hemati; Behrooz Zaman; Valliolah Hassani; Farnad Imani; Parviz Dariaie
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-19

3.  The efficacy of low-dose transdermal fentanyl in opioid-naïve cancer patients with moderate-to-severe pain.

Authors:  Jung Hun Kang; Sung Yong Oh; Seo-Young Song; Hui-Young Lee; Jung Han Kim; Kyoung Eun Lee; Hye Ran Lee; In Gyu Hwang; Se Hoon Park; Won Seok Kim; Young Suk Park; Keunchil Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.884

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.