Literature DB >> 20353478

Clinical outcomes for Saudi and Egyptian patients receiving deceased donor liver transplantation in China.

N Allam1, M Al Saghier, Y El Sheikh, M Al Sofayan, H Khalaf, M Al Sebayel, A Helmy, Y Kamel, A Aljedai, H Abdel-Dayem, N M Kenetman, A Al Saghier, W Al Hamoudi, A A Abdo.   

Abstract

Long waiting list times in liver transplant programs in Saudi Arabia and unavailability of deceased donor transplantation in Egypt have led several patients to seek transplantation in China. All patients who received transplants in China and followed in three centers from January 2003-January 2007 were included. All patients' charts were reviewed. Mortality and morbidity were compared to those transplanted in King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (KFSH&RC) during the same period. Seventy-four adult patients were included (46 Saudi nationals; 28 Egyptians). One-year and 3-year cumulative patient survival rates were 83% and 62%, respectively compared to 92% and 84% in KFSH&RC. One-year and 3-year cumulative graft survival rates were 81% and 59%, respectively compared to 90% and 84% in KFSH&RC. Compared to KFSH&RC, the incidence of complications was significantly higher especially biliary complications, sepsis, metastasis and acquired HBV infection posttransplant. Requirements of postoperative interventions and hospital admissions were also significantly greater. Our data show high mortality and morbidity rates in Saudi and Egyptian patients receiving transplants in China. This could be related to more liberal selection criteria, use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors or possibly more limited posttransplant care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20353478     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  6 in total

Review 1.  Comparing outcomes of donation after cardiac death versus donation after brain death in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Malcolm Wells; Kris M Croome; Toni Janik; Roberto M Hernandez-Alejandro; Natasha M Chandok
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-11-28

2.  The impact of metabolic syndrome and prevalent liver disease on living donor liver transplantation: a pressing need to expand the pool.

Authors:  Waleed Al-Hamoudi; Faisal Abaalkhail; Abdurahman Bendahmash; Naglaa Allam; Bassem Hegab; Yasser Elsheikh; Hamad Al-bahili; Nasser Almasri; Mohammed Al-sofayan; Saleh Alabbad; Mohammed Al-Sebayel; Dieter Broering; Hussien Elsiesy
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 6.047

3.  The use of organs from executed prisoners in china.

Authors:  Rosalba Romano; Ornella Piazza
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2012-04-30

Review 4.  Management of hepatitis c genotype 4 in the liver transplant setting.

Authors:  Waleed K Al-Hamoudi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

5.  The outcomes and controversies of transplant tourism-Lessons of an 11-year retrospective cohort study from Taiwan.

Authors:  Daniel Fu-Chang Tsai; Shi-Wei Huang; Soren Holm; Yi-Ping Lin; Yu-Kang Chang; Chih-Cheng Hsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Liver transplantation at KFSHRC: achievement and challenges.

Authors:  Mohammed I Al; Faisal A Abaalkhail; Hamad Al Bahili; Almoutaz Hashim Abdo; Hussein A Elsiesy; Mohammed S Al; Yasser M El Sheikh; Bassem S Hegab; Yasser M Kamel; Talal T AlGoufi; Hazem H Hasssan; Martin M Burdelski; Mohammad A Al; Mohamed R Abdelfattah; Khaled M Attallah; Talat Z Mahmood; Yahya Z Saleh; Firas Zahr Eldeen; Dieter C Broering
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.