Literature DB >> 20353255

A two-dimensional computational model of lymph transport across primary lymphatic valves.

Peter Galie1, Robert L Spilker.   

Abstract

This study utilizes a finite element model to characterize the transendothelial transport through overlapping endothelial cells in primary lymphatics during the uptake of interstitial fluid. The computational model is built upon the analytical model of these junctions created by Mendoza and Schmid-Schonbein (2003, "A Model for Mechanics of Primary Lymphatic Valves," J. Biomed. Eng., 125, pp. 407-414). The goal of the present study is to investigate how adding more sophisticated and physiologically representative biomechanics affects the model's prediction of fluid uptake. These changes include incorporating a porous domain to represent interstitial space, accounting for finite deformation of the deflecting endothelial cell, and utilizing an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian algorithm to account for interacting and nonlinear mechanics of the junctions. First, the present model is compared with the analytical model in order to understand its effects on parameters such as cell deflection, pressure distribution, and velocity profile of the fluid entering the lumen. Without accounting for the porous nature of the interstitium, the computational model predicts greater cell deflection and consequently higher lymph velocities and flow rates than the analytical model. However, incorporating the porous domain attenuates the cell deflection and flow rate to values below that predicted by the analytical model for a given transmural pressure. Second, the present model incorporates recent experimental data for parameters such as lymph viscosity, transmural pressure measurements, and others to evaluate the ability of these junctions to act as unidirectional valves. The volume of flow through the valve is calculated to be 0.114 nL/microm per cycle for a transmural pressure varying between 8.0 mm Hg and -1.0 mm Hg at 0.4 Hz. Though experimental data for the absorption of lymph through these endothelial junctions are scarce, several measurements of lymph velocity and flow rates are cited to validate the present model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20353255     DOI: 10.1115/1.3212108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  14 in total

1.  Simultaneous application of interstitial flow and cyclic mechanical strain to a three-dimensional cell-seeded hydrogel.

Authors:  Peter A Galie; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Quantification of the passive and active biaxial mechanical behaviour and microstructural organization of rat thoracic ducts.

Authors:  Alexander W Caulk; Zhanna V Nepiyushchikh; Ryan Shaw; J Brandon Dixon; Rudolph L Gleason
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Lymphatic anatomy and biomechanics.

Authors:  Daniela Negrini; Andrea Moriondo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The advection of microparticles, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in response to very low Reynolds numbers.

Authors:  Sinéad T Morley; Michael T Walsh; David T Newport
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 5.  Space physiology IV: mathematical modeling of the cardiovascular system in space exploration.

Authors:  M Keith Sharp; Jerry Joseph Batzel; Jean-Pierre Montani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  A computational model of a network of initial lymphatics and pre-collectors with permeable interstitium.

Authors:  B O Ikhimwin; C D Bertram; S Jamalian; C Macaskill
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-11-07

Review 7.  Convective diffusion of nanoparticles from the epithelial barrier toward regional lymph nodes.

Authors:  Stanislav S Dukhin; Mohamed E Labib
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 12.984

Review 8.  Primary and secondary lymphatic valve development: molecular, functional and mechanical insights.

Authors:  Eleni Bazigou; John T Wilson; James E Moore
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.514

9.  Engineering the Lymphatic System.

Authors:  Matthew E Nipper; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.495

10.  Lymphatic System Flows.

Authors:  James E Moore; Christopher D Bertram
Journal:  Annu Rev Fluid Mech       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 18.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.