Literature DB >> 20351899

The effectiveness of a secure email reminder system for colorectal cancer screening.

David Muller1, Judith Logan, David Dorr, David Mosen.   

Abstract

This study looks at the effectiveness of using a secure email system linked to an electronic health record to send reminders to patients in an effort to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates; 1397 subjects were randomized to receive usual care, a letter reminder or an email reminder which invited patients to pick up a fecal occult blood test at the lab for CRC screening. The number of completed CRC screenings was tallied after a 3 month study period. Rates of CRC screening in the 3 groups were 7.8% in the usual care group, 23.6% in the letter reminder group and 22.7% in the email group. Significant statistical difference was seen between usual care group and letter reminders (p<0.0005) and between usual care and email reminders (p<0.0005) but not between the letter reminders and the email reminders (p=7.11). Email reminders are as effective as letter reminders in increasing CRC screening rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20351899      PMCID: PMC2815450     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  21 in total

1.  Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  B S Ling; M A Moskowitz; D Wachs; B Pearson; P C Schroy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail.

Authors:  B Kane; D Z Sands
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care.

Authors:  Cheryl A Moyer; David T Stern; Karen S Dobias; Douglas T Cox; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Enhancing doctor-patient communication using email: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shou Ling Leong; Dennis Gingrich; Peter R Lewis; David T Mauger; John H George
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2005 May-Jun

6.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa DiCarlo; Ronald E Myers; Thomas Wolf; James Cocroft; Randa Sifri; Michael Rosenthal; Sally W Vernon; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices.

Authors:  Richard K Zimmerman; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Melissa Tabbarah; Seymour Grufferman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: a pilot controlled trial.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Alison T Brenner; Jennifer M Griffith; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  9 in total

1.  E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content.

Authors:  Sarah L Cutrona; Joann Wagner; Douglas W Roblin; Bridget Gaglio; Andrew Williams; Rosalie Torres-Stone; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-04-03

2.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Electronic patient messages to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Graham A Colditz; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-12-13

4.  Examining the Multi-level Fit between Work and Technology in a Secure Messaging Implementation.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozkaynak; Sharon Johnson; Stephanie Shimada; Beth Ann Petrakis; Bengisu Tulu; Cliona Archambeault; Gemmae Fix; Erin Schwartz; Susan Woods
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

5.  Evaluation of a multimedia outreach campaign for a multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening among non-medicare employer population in the United States.

Authors:  Martha E Shepherd; Ashlee Lecorps; Lori Inman; Lesley-Ann Miller-Wilson
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  Applying operations research to optimize a novel population management system for cancer screening.

Authors:  Adrian H Zai; Seokjin Kim; Arnold Kamis; Ken Hung; Jeremiah G Ronquillo; Henry C Chueh; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  A Mobile Web App to Improve Health Screening Uptake in Men (ScreenMen): Utility and Usability Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Chin Hai Teo; Chirk Jenn Ng; Sin Kuang Lo; Chip Dong Lim; Alan White
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Adapting to telemedicine in the COVID-19 era: Feasibility of dried blood spot testing for hemoglobin A1c.

Authors:  Alissa J Roberts; Faisal Malik; Catherine Pihoker; Jane A Dickerson
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 9.  The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Laura F Gruner; Efrat L Amitay; Thomas Heisser; Feng Guo; Tobias Niedermaier; Anton Gies; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.