OBJECTIVES: To assess how children requiring endotracheal intubation are mechanically ventilated in Italian pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). DESIGN: A prospective, national, observational, multicenter, 6-month study. SETTING: Eighteen medical-surgical PICUs. PATIENTS: A total of 1943 consecutive children, aged 0-16 yrs, admitted between November 1, 2006 and April 30, 2007. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data on cause of respiratory failure, length of mechanical ventilation (MV), mode of ventilation, use of specific interventions were recorded for all children requiring endotracheal intubation for >24 hrs. Children were stratified for age, type of patient, and cause of respiratory failure. A total of 956 (49.2%) patients required MV via an endotracheal tube; 673 (34.6%) were ventilated for >24 hrs. The median length of MV was 4.5 days for all patients. If postoperative patients were excluded, the median time was 5 days. Bronchiolitis (6.7%), pneumonia (6.7%), and upper airway obstruction (5.3%) were the most frequent causes of acute respiratory failure, and altered mental status (9.2%) was the most frequent reason for MV. The overall mortality was 6.7% with highest rates for heart disease (nonoperative), sepsis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (26.1%, 22.2%, and 16.7% respectively). Length of stay, associated chronic disease, severity score on admission, and PICU mortality were significantly higher in children who received MV (p < .05) than in children who did not. Controlled MV and pressure support ventilation + synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation were the most frequently used modes of ventilatory assistance during PICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical ventilation is frequently used in Italian PICUs with almost one child of two requiring endotracheal intubation. Children treated with MV represent a more severe category of patients than children who are breathing spontaneously. Describing the standard care and how MV is performed in children can be useful for future clinical studies.
OBJECTIVES: To assess how children requiring endotracheal intubation are mechanically ventilated in Italian pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). DESIGN: A prospective, national, observational, multicenter, 6-month study. SETTING: Eighteen medical-surgical PICUs. PATIENTS: A total of 1943 consecutive children, aged 0-16 yrs, admitted between November 1, 2006 and April 30, 2007. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data on cause of respiratory failure, length of mechanical ventilation (MV), mode of ventilation, use of specific interventions were recorded for all children requiring endotracheal intubation for >24 hrs. Children were stratified for age, type of patient, and cause of respiratory failure. A total of 956 (49.2%) patients required MV via an endotracheal tube; 673 (34.6%) were ventilated for >24 hrs. The median length of MV was 4.5 days for all patients. If postoperative patients were excluded, the median time was 5 days. Bronchiolitis (6.7%), pneumonia (6.7%), and upper airway obstruction (5.3%) were the most frequent causes of acute respiratory failure, and altered mental status (9.2%) was the most frequent reason for MV. The overall mortality was 6.7% with highest rates for heart disease (nonoperative), sepsis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (26.1%, 22.2%, and 16.7% respectively). Length of stay, associated chronic disease, severity score on admission, and PICU mortality were significantly higher in children who received MV (p < .05) than in children who did not. Controlled MV and pressure support ventilation + synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation were the most frequently used modes of ventilatory assistance during PICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical ventilation is frequently used in Italian PICUs with almost one child of two requiring endotracheal intubation. Children treated with MV represent a more severe category of patients than children who are breathing spontaneously. Describing the standard care and how MV is performed in children can be useful for future clinical studies.
Authors: Pablo Cruces; Franco Díaz; Alonso Puga; Benjamín Erranz; Alejandro Donoso; Cristóbal Carvajal; Jan Wilhelm; Gabriela M Repetto Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Debra Boyer; Carey C Thomson; Robyn Cohen; Devika Rao; Sharon Dell; Jonathan Rayment; Ruobing Wang; Fei J Dy; Jennifer Wambach; Jade Tam-Williams; Dawn Simon; Eric Price; Christopher M Oermann; Alvin Singh; Jordan S Rettig; Elizabeth D Duncan; Christopher D Baker; Deborah R Liptzin; Paul E Moore Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-06
Authors: Waleed H Albuali; Amal A Algamdi; Elham A Hasan; Mohammad H Al-Qahtani; Abdullah A Yousef; Mohammad A Al Ghamdi; Dalal K Bubshait; Mohammed S Alshahrani; Faisal O AlQurashi; Talal A Bou Shahmah; Bassam H Awary Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2020-11-11
Authors: Bronagh Blackwood; Lyvonne N Tume; Kevin P Morris; Mike Clarke; Clíona McDowell; Karla Hemming; Mark J Peters; Lisa McIlmurray; Joanne Jordan; Ashley Agus; Margaret Murray; Roger Parslow; Timothy S Walsh; Duncan Macrae; Christina Easter; Richard G Feltbower; Daniel F McAuley Journal: JAMA Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 56.272