Literature DB >> 20351436

Practical applications of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for water safety plans.

P W M H Smeets1, L C Rietveld, J C van Dijk, G J Medema.   

Abstract

The absence of indicator organisms in drinking water does not provide sufficient guarantee for microbial safety. Therefore the water utilities are implementing water safety plans (WSP) to safeguard drinking water quality. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) can be used to provide objective quantitative input for the WSP. This study presents several applications of treatment modelling in QMRA to answer the risk managers questions raised in the WSP. QMRA can estimate how safe the water is, how much the safety varies and how certain the estimate of safety is. This can be used in the WSP system assessment to determine whether treatment is meeting health-based targets with the required level of certainty. Quantitative data analysis showed that short events of only 8 hours per year can dominate the yearly average health risk for the consumer. QMRA also helps the design of physical and microbial monitoring. The study showed that the required monitoring frequency increases with increasing treatment efficacy. Daily monitoring can be sufficient to verify a treatment process achieving 2 log reduction of pathogens, but a process achieving 4 log reduction needs to be monitored every 15 minutes. Similarly, QMRA helps to prepare adequate corrective actions by determining the acceptable 'down time' of a process. For example, for a process achieving 2.5 log reduction a down time of maximum 6 hours per year is acceptable. These applications illustrate how QMRA can contribute to efficient and effective management of microbial drinking water safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20351436     DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  6 in total

Review 1.  Microbial Contamination of Drinking Water and Human Health from Community Water Systems.

Authors:  Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-03

2.  Concentration of soil-transmitted helminth eggs in sludge from South Africa and Senegal: A probabilistic estimation of infection risks associated with agricultural application.

Authors:  Isaac Dennis Amoah; Poovendhree Reddy; Razak Seidu; Thor Axel Stenström
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Recreational water quality status of the Kidd's Beach as determined by its physicochemical and bacteriological quality parameters.

Authors:  Oluwaseun O Adeniji; Timothy Sibanda; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-06-21

4.  The feasibility of automated online flow cytometry for in-situ monitoring of microbial dynamics in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Michael D Besmer; David G Weissbrodt; Bradley E Kratochvil; Jürg A Sigrist; Mathias S Weyland; Frederik Hammes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  The Impact of Human Activities on Microbial Quality of Rivers in the Vhembe District, South Africa.

Authors:  Afsatou N Traoré; Khodani Mulaudzi; Gamuchirai J E Chari; Stefan H Foord; Lutendo S Mudau; Tobias G Barnard; Natasha Potgieter
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Coronavirus: occurrence, surveillance, and persistence in wastewater.

Authors:  Snehalatha Basavaraju; Jamuna Bai Aswathanarayan; Madhu Basavegowda; Balasubramanian Somanathan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.513

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.