| Literature DB >> 31294097 |
Oluwaseun O Adeniji1,2, Timothy Sibanda3, Anthony I Okoh1,2.
Abstract
Coastal water resources are habitually exposed to indiscriminate anthropogenic pollution. However, due to their negative consequences to the public health, recreational waters require continuous monitoring for disease-causing organisms as a way of preventing ailments associated with swimming. As a result, the present study assessed the physicochemical parameters and microbial loads of water samples collected from six different sampling points on Kidd's Beach using standard analytical procedures. Generated data were analysed with One-way ANOVA and spearman correlation (at 95%). The physicochemical qualities varied as follows: pH (7.21-8.23), temperature (18.46-27.63 °C), turbidity (0-25.67 NTU), electrical conductivity (22723-62067 μS/cm), total dissolved solids (7662-31037 mg/L), and salinity (8.95-41.84 PSU). All these measured parameters were significantly different (P < 0.05) with respect to the sampling sites. Presumptive Enterococcus counts ranged from 64 - 168 CFU/100 mL of water samples. Out of 409 presumptive Enterococcus isolates obtained from the culture-based method, 67 were confirmed to be Enterococcus by PCR-techniques. From the 67 confirmed isolates, 19(E. faecalis) and 40(E. feacium) while 8(other species that were non-targeted). Findings from this study shown that Kidd's Beach water samples contain some pathogenic bacteria that pose high risk to the public health and make it to be unfit for recreational use when compared to DWAF and US EPA guidelines. Therefore, effort should be made to strictly control all activities contributing to the level of pollution in the marine environment.Entities:
Keywords: Enterococcus; Environmental science; Kidd's beach; Microbiology; Physicochemical; Public health; Recreation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31294097 PMCID: PMC6595171 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Primers for the speciation of Enterococcus species. (are there no genes used to target their strains?).
| Target strains | Primer | Sequences (5′–3′) | PCR cycling conditions | Product Size(bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL1 | ACTTATGTGACTAACTTAACC TAATGGTGAATCTTGGTTTGG | 95 °C (4 min), 30 cycles of {94 °C (30 sec), 52 °C (1 min), 72 °C (1 min)}, 72 °C (7 min) | 360 | ||
| DU1 | CCTACTGATATTAAGACAGCG | 95 °C (4 min), 30 cycles of {94 °C (30 sec), 52 °C (1 min), 72 °C (1 min)}, 72 °C (7 min) | 295 | ||
| CA1 | TCCTGAATTAGGTGAAAAAAC | 95 °C (4 min), 30 cycles of {94 °C (30 sec), 52 °C (1 min), 72 °C (1 min)}, 72 °C (7 min) | 288 | ||
| FM1 | GAAAAAACAATAGAAGAATTAT | 95 °C (4 min), 30 cycles of {94 °C (30 sec), 48 °C (1 min), 72 °C (1 min)}, 72 °C (7 min) | 215 | ||
| HI1 | CTTTCTGATATGGATGCTGTC | 95 °C (4 min), 30 cycles of {94 °C (30 sec), 48 °C (1 min), 72 °C (1 min)}, 72 °C (7 min) | 187 |
Fig. 1A map showing the sampling points in Kidd's Beach.
Relationship among the physicochemical parameters and Enterococcus spp at Kidd's Beach (November 2017–April 2018).
| EC | pH | salinity | TDS | Temp | enterococci Count | Turbidity | Statistic | Parameter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.01478 | .930** | 1.000** | -.466** | -.377** | 0.028715 | Pearson Correlation | EC |
| 0.849237 | 4.99E-74 | 0 | 2.04E-10 | 4.64E-07 | 0.711763 | Sig. (2-tailed) | ||
| 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | N | ||
| 1 | -0.02242 | -0.01491 | 0.059861 | 0.015574 | -.375** | pH | ||
| 0.773006 | 0.847879 | 0.440835 | 0.841193 | 5.44E-07 | Sig. (2-tailed) | |||
| 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | N | |||
| 1 | .930** | -.450** | -.278** | 0.002895 | salinity | |||
| 4.8E-74 | 9.73E-10 | 0.000264 | 0.970291 | Sig. (2-tailed) | ||||
| 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | N | ||||
| 1 | -.466** | -.378** | 0.02834 | TDS | ||||
| 1.88E-10 | 4.36E-07 | 0.715365 | Sig. (2-tailed) | |||||
| 168 | 168 | 168 | N | |||||
| 1 | .389** | -0.10193 | Temp | |||||
| 1.93E-07 | 0.18859 | Sig. (2-tailed) | ||||||
| 168 | 168 | N | ||||||
| 1 | -.152* | Count | ||||||
| 0.048785 | Sig. (2-tailed) | |||||||
| 1 | Turbidity | |||||||
| Sig. (2-tailed) | ||||||||
| N |
N = sample size. EC: Electrical conductivity, TDS total dissolved solids.
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Fig. 2The physicochemical parameters of coastal water at the Kidd's Beach, November 2017 to April 2018.
Fig. 3Geometric mean of Enterococcus (CFU/100mL).
Fig. 4PCR products of the amplification of tuf-gene. Lane M: molecular weight marker (100 bp); lane N: negative control; lane P: positive control (DSM 20478) lanes 1–10: positive isolates.
Fig. 5Gel image showing molecular confirmation of E. feacalis (360). Lane M: molecular weight marker (100bp); Lane P: positive control (DSM20478) Lane N: Negative control: Lane 1–3 are positive isolates; N: negative control; Lane 4–8 positive isolates.
Fig. 6Gel image showing molecular confirmation of E. feacium (215bp). Lane M: molecular weight marker (100bp); Lane P: positive control (DSM 20478) Lane N: Negative control: Lane 1–10 are positive isolates.