Literature DB >> 20350179

What does the right hemisphere know about phoneme categories?

Michael Wolmetz1, David Poeppel, Brenda Rapp.   

Abstract

Innate auditory sensitivities and familiarity with the sounds of language give rise to clear influences of phonemic categories on adult perception of speech. With few exceptions, current models endorse highly left-hemisphere-lateralized mechanisms responsible for the influence of phonemic category on speech perception, based primarily on results from functional imaging and brain-lesion studies. Here we directly test the hypothesis that the right hemisphere does not engage in phonemic analysis. By using fMRI to identify cortical sites sensitive to phonemes in both word and pronounceable nonword contexts, we find evidence that right-hemisphere phonemic sensitivity is limited to a lexical context. We extend the interpretation of these fMRI results through the study of an individual with a left-hemisphere lesion who is right-hemisphere reliant for initial acoustic and phonetic analysis of speech. This individual's performance revealed that the right hemisphere alone was insufficient to allow for typical phonemic category effects but did support the processing of gradient phonetic information in lexical contexts. Taken together, these findings confirm previous claims that the right temporal cortex does not play a primary role in phoneme processing, but they also indicate that lexical context may modulate the involvement of a right hemisphere largely tuned for less abstract dimensions of the speech signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350179      PMCID: PMC4471482          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  51 in total

1.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

Review 2.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

3.  The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception.

Authors:  Ingo G Meister; Stephen M Wilson; Choi Deblieck; Allan D Wu; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds.

Authors:  N Gage; D Poeppel; T P Roberts; G Hickok
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Phonemic identification defect in aphasia.

Authors:  A Basso; G Casati; L A Vignolo
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Temporal encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex.

Authors:  M Steinschneider; I O Volkov; M D Noh; P C Garell; M A Howard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Language recovery after left hemispherectomy in children with late-onset seizures.

Authors:  D Boatman; J Freeman; E Vining; M Pulsifer; D Miglioretti; R Minahan; B Carson; J Brandt; G McKhann
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Inferior frontal regions underlie the perception of phonetic category invariance.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Sheila E Blumstein; Edward Walsh; James Eliassen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-08

9.  Lexical influences on speech perception: a Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates.

Authors:  David W Gow; Jennifer A Segawa; Seppo P Ahlfors; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Cortical sites critical for speech discrimination in normal and impaired listeners.

Authors:  Dana F Boatman; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  15 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in superior temporal sulcus connectivity during perception of noisy audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Audrey R Nath; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Representation of speech categories in the primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joji Tsunada; Jung Hoon Lee; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Representations of Invariant Musical Categories Are Decodable by Pattern Analysis of Locally Distributed BOLD Responses in Superior Temporal and Intraparietal Sulci.

Authors:  Mike E Klein; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Dynamic speech representations in the human temporal lobe.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Word deafness with preserved number word perception.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Rachel Mis; Heather Dial
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Single-case cognitive neuropsychology in the age of big data.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Simon Fischer-Baum
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Left posterior temporal regions are sensitive to auditory categorization.

Authors:  Rutvik Desai; Einat Liebenthal; Eric Waldron; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  An Investigation of Place and Voice Features Using fMRI-Adaptation.

Authors:  Laurel Lawyer; David Corina
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.710

10.  Dyslexia impairs speech recognition but can spare phonological competence.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum; Evan Balaban; Albert M Galaburda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.