Literature DB >> 20349304

Ascending aortic aneurysm in a patient with an aortic Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis implanted 39 years previously.

Kosaku Nishigawa1, Toshinori Totsugawa, Hidenori Yoshitaka, Yoshimasa Tsushima, Masahiko Kuinose, Genta Chikazawa.   

Abstract

A 53-year-old man who had undergone aortic valve replacement with a Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis 39 years previously was admitted to our hospital under the diagnosis of ascending aortic aneurysm. Operative findings revealed that the ball valve was functioning normally. The markedly dilated ascending aorta was replaced with a 30-mm prosthetic vascular graft, and the ball valve was replaced with a19-mm bileaflet valve prosthesis. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged from our hospital 19 days after surgery. Dilatation of the ascending aorta in this case might have been caused by the poststenotic dilatation mechanism, which seems to be one of the long-term complications of Starr-Edwards ball valve implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20349304     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-009-0504-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  9 in total

1.  Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis.

Authors:  A STARR; M L EDWARDS
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  A critical review of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve with dilated ascending aorta.

Authors:  Warren G Guntheroth
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Aortic and mitral valve incompetence: long-term follow-up (10 to 19 years) of patients treated with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis.

Authors:  M D McGoon; V Fuster; D C McGoon; C W Pumphrey; J R Pluth; L R Elveback
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Valve-sparing root replacement after prior Starr-Edwards aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Clifton C Reade; Alan P Kypson; J Mark Williams
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2005-09

5.  Event status of the Starr-Edwards aortic valve to 20 years: a benchmark for comparison.

Authors:  T A Orszulak; H V Schaff; F J Puga; G K Danielson; C J Mullany; B J Anderson; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Thirty-year results of Starr-Edwards prostheses in the aortic and mitral position.

Authors:  O L Gödje; T Fischlein; K Adelhard; G Nollert; W Klinner; B Reichart
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Failure to prevent progressive dilation of ascending aorta by aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with tricuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Hisayo Yasuda; Satoshi Nakatani; Marie Stugaard; Yuko Tsujita-Kuroda; Ko Bando; Junjiro Kobayashi; Masakazu Yamagishi; Masafumi Kitakaze; Soichiro Kitamura; Kunio Miyatake
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Starr-Edwards aortic prosthesis: a 20-year retrospective study.

Authors:  J F Best; K M Hassanein; D M Pugh; M Dunn
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Use of the Bentall method for replacement of an aortic Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis implanted 32 years previously.

Authors:  Daisuke Yotsumoto; Yoshifumi Iguro; Takayuki Ueno; Kazuhisa Matsumoto; Ryuzo Sakata
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-08
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Long-term durability of Starr-Edwards ball valve.

Authors:  Shoji Eguchi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.731

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.