Literature DB >> 20349177

Analytic model comparing the cost utility of TVT versus duloxetine in women with urinary stress incontinence.

Paul Jacklin1, Jonathan Duckett, Arasee Renganathan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to assess cost utility of duloxetine versus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) as a second-line treatment for urinary stress incontinence.
METHODS: A Markov model was used to compare the cost utility based on a 2-year follow-up period. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) estimation was performed by assuming a disutility rate of 0.05.
RESULTS: Under base-case assumptions, although duloxetine was a cheaper option, TVT gave a considerably higher QALY gain. When a longer follow-up period was considered, TVT had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of pound 7,710 ($12,651) at 10 years. If the QALY gain from cure was 0.09, then the ICER for duloxetine and TVT would both fall within the indicative National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence willingness to pay threshold at 2 years, but TVT would be the cost-effective option having extended dominance over duloxetine.
CONCLUSIONS: This model suggests that TVT is a cost-effective treatment for stress incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20349177     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1132-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  20 in total

1.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Economic evaluation of duloxetine for the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence: a Markov model comparing pharmacotherapy with pelvic floor muscle training.

Authors:  Daniëlle E M Brunenberg; Manuela A Joore; Christiaan P W M Veraart; Bary C M Berghmans; C Huub van der Vaart; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Tolerability and efficacy of duloxetine in a nontrial situation.

Authors:  J R A Duckett; M Vella; G Kavalakuntla; M Basu
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population.

Authors:  N Mittmann; K Trakas; N Risebrough; B A Liu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of tolterodine for patients with urge incontinence who discontinue initial therapy with oxybutynin: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; R Goeree; L Bernard; A Rosner; T Williamson
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Efficacy of duloxetine, a potent and balanced serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor in persistent pain models in rats.

Authors:  Smriti Iyengar; Amy A Webster; Susan K Hemrick-Luecke; Jimmy Yu Xu; Rosa Maria A Simmons
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Long-term efficacy of duloxetine in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Richard C Bump; Simon Voss; Anthony Beardsworth; Martina Manning; Yan D Zhao; Wei Chen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence.

Authors:  Karen Ward; Paul Hilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-13

9.  Is Burch colposuspension ever cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence?

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Anthony G Visco; Alison C Weidner; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Duloxetine in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Wolfgang H Jost; Parvaneh Marsalek
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Comparison between three mini-sling surgical procedures and the traditional transobturator vaginal tape technique for female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  V Leanza; E Intagliata; A Leanza; F Ferla; G Leanza; R Vecchio
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

2.  The effectiveness of urinary incontinence treatments measured using the 15D Health-Related Quality of Life instrument.

Authors:  Aura Pyykönen; Pasi Aronen; Pirjo Räsänen; Risto P Roine; Jari Sjöberg; Anna-Maija Tapper
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  The financial burden of stress urinary incontinence among women in the United States.

Authors:  Erin C Chong; Aqsa A Khan; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Stress urinary incontinence and LUTS in women--effects on sexual function.

Authors:  Brigitte Fatton; Renaud de Tayrac; Pierre Costa
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Akinbowale Familusi; Shona Fielding; John Ford; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The SIMS trial: adjustable anchored single-incision mini-slings versus standard tension-free midurethral slings in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. A study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Graeme MacLennan; Mary Kilonzo; R Phil Assassa; Kirsty McCormick; Tracey Davidson; Alison McDonald; James N'Dow; Judith Wardle; John Norrie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of economic evidence.

Authors:  Mehdi Javanbakht; Eoin Moloney; Miriam Brazzelli; Sheila Wallace; Muhammad Imran Omar; Ash Monga; Lucky Saraswat; Phil Mackie; Mari Imamura; Jemma Hudson; Michal Shimonovich; Graeme MacLennan; Luke Vale; Dawn Craig
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-20

8.  Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies.

Authors:  Sandra Zwolsman; Arnoud Kastelein; Joost Daams; Jan-Paul Roovers; B C Opmeer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.