Literature DB >> 17618760

Is Burch colposuspension ever cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence?

Jennifer M Wu1, Anthony G Visco, Alison C Weidner, Evan R Myers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Burch colposuspension compared with tension-free vaginal tape. STUDY
DESIGN: A Markov decision model was developed to compare costs (2005 US dollars) and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life years) of Burch and tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence over 10 years from a health care system perspective. After surgery, outcomes included cure, persistent stress urinary incontinence followed by second surgery, and persistent stress urinary incontinence and mesh erosion after tension-free vaginal tape. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of less than $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year was considered cost-effective.
RESULTS: For the base-case, the Burch strategy cost more than tension-free vaginal tape ($9320 vs $8081), but was slightly more effective (7.260 vs 7.248 quality-adjusted life years). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $98,755 per quality-adjusted life year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was less than $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year when the relative risk of cure after Burch to tension-free vaginal tape was greater than 1.09.
CONCLUSION: Burch colposuspension was not cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape. However, if the tension-free vaginal tape failure rate was to increase over time, Burch may become cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618760     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Healthcare rationing by proxy: cost-effectiveness analysis and the misuse of the $50,000 threshold in the US.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Analytic model comparing the cost utility of TVT versus duloxetine in women with urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Paul Jacklin; Jonathan Duckett; Arasee Renganathan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Marie Carmela M Lapitan; June D Cody; Atefeh Mashayekhi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-25

4.  Factors predictive of outcome in tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Hendrik Cammu; Elke Van Den Abbeele; Hellen Nagel; Patrick Haentjens
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-10

5.  Surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women: safety, effectiveness and cost-utility of trans-obturator tape (TOT) versus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) five years after a randomized surgical trial.

Authors:  Sue Ross; Magali Robert; Doug Lier; Misha Eliasziw; Philip Jacobs
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of economic evidence.

Authors:  Mehdi Javanbakht; Eoin Moloney; Miriam Brazzelli; Sheila Wallace; Muhammad Imran Omar; Ash Monga; Lucky Saraswat; Phil Mackie; Mari Imamura; Jemma Hudson; Michal Shimonovich; Graeme MacLennan; Luke Vale; Dawn Craig
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.