Literature DB >> 20348303

Interplay between Clostridium thermocellum family 48 and family 9 cellulases in cellulosomal versus noncellulosomal states.

Yael Vazana1, Sarah Moraïs, Yoav Barak, Raphael Lamed, Edward A Bayer.   

Abstract

The anaerobic, thermophilic cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum is known for its elaborate cellulosome complex, but it also produces a separate free cellulase system. Among the free enzymes, the noncellulosomal enzyme Cel9I is a processive endoglucanase whose sequence and architecture are very similar to those of the cellulosomal enzyme Cel9R; likewise, the noncellulosomal exoglucanase Cel48Y is analogous to the principal cellulosomal enzyme Cel48S. In this study we used the designer cellulosome approach to examine the interplay of prominent cellulosomal and noncellulosomal cellulases from C. thermocellum. Toward this end, we converted the cellulosomal enzymes to noncellulosomal chimeras by swapping the dockerin module of the cellulosomal enzymes with a carbohydrate-binding module from the free enzyme analogues and vice versa. This enabled us to study the importance of the targeting effect of the free enzymes due to their carbohydrate-binding module and the proximity effect for cellulases on the designer cellulosome. C. thermocellum is the only cellulosome-producing bacterium known to express two different glycoside hydrolase family 48 enzymes and thus the only bacterial system that can currently be used for such studies. The different activities with crystalline cellulose were examined, and the results demonstrated that the individual chimeric cellulases were essentially equivalent to the corresponding wild-type analogues. The wild-type cellulases displayed a synergism of about 1.5-fold; the cellulosomal pair acted synergistically when they were converted into free enzymes, whereas the free enzymes acted synergistically mainly in the wild-type state. The targeting effect was found to be the major factor responsible for the elevated activity observed for these specific enzyme combinations, whereas the proximity effect appeared to play a negligible role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20348303      PMCID: PMC2869131          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00009-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  43 in total

Review 1.  The cellulosome concept as an efficient microbial strategy for the degradation of insoluble polysaccharides.

Authors:  Y Shoham; R Lamed; E A Bayer
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 17.079

2.  Exploration of new geometries in cellulosome-like chimeras.

Authors:  Florence Mingardon; Angélique Chanal; Chantal Tardif; Edward A Bayer; Henri-Pierre Fierobe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Global view of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome revealed by quantitative proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas D Gold; Vincent J J Martin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Cohesin-dockerin microarray: Diverse specificities between two complementary families of interacting protein modules.

Authors:  Rachel Haimovitz; Yoav Barak; Ely Morag; Milana Voronov-Goldman; Yuval Shoham; Raphael Lamed; Edward A Bayer
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 5.  From cellulosomes to cellulosomics.

Authors:  Edward A Bayer; Raphael Lamed; Bryan A White; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Chem Rec       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.771

6.  Molecular engineering of the cellulosome complex for affinity and bioenergy applications.

Authors:  Robert E Nordon; Scott J Craig; Frances C Foong
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.461

7.  A major new component in the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum is a processive endo-beta-1,4-glucanase producing cellotetraose.

Authors:  Vladimir V Zverlov; Nikolaus Schantz; Wolfgang H Schwarz
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  Conversion of Thermobifida fusca free exoglucanases into cellulosomal components: comparative impact on cellulose-degrading activity.

Authors:  Jonathan Caspi; Diana Irwin; Raphael Lamed; Yongchao Li; Henri-Pierre Fierobe; David B Wilson; Edward A Bayer
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Cloning and expression of the Clostridium thermocellum celS gene in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W K Wang; K Kruus; J H Wu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Effect of linker length and dockerin position on conversion of a Thermobifida fusca endoglucanase to the cellulosomal mode.

Authors:  Jonathan Caspi; Yoav Barak; Rachel Haimovitz; Diana Irwin; Raphael Lamed; David B Wilson; Edward A Bayer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  24 in total

1.  Demonstration of the importance for cellulose hydrolysis of CelS, the most abundant cellulosomal cellulase in Clostridium thermocellum [corrected].

Authors:  David B Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Crucial roles of single residues in binding affinity, specificity, and promiscuity in the cellulosomal cohesin-dockerin interface.

Authors:  Michal Slutzki; Dan Reshef; Yoav Barak; Rachel Haimovitz; Shahar Rotem-Bamberger; Raphael Lamed; Edward A Bayer; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The first identification of carbohydrate binding modules specific to chitosan.

Authors:  Shoko Shinya; Takayuki Ohnuma; Reina Yamashiro; Hisashi Kimoto; Hideo Kusaoke; Padmanabhan Anbazhagan; André H Juffer; Tamo Fukamizo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Dynamic interactions of type I cohesin modules fine-tune the structure of the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum.

Authors:  Anders Barth; Jelle Hendrix; Daniel Fried; Yoav Barak; Edward A Bayer; Don C Lamb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sequence, structure, and evolution of cellulases in glycoside hydrolase family 48.

Authors:  Leonid O Sukharnikov; Markus Alahuhta; Roman Brunecky; Amit Upadhyay; Michael E Himmel; Vladimir V Lunin; Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Enhanced microbial utilization of recalcitrant cellulose by an ex vivo cellulosome-microbe complex.

Authors:  Chun You; Xiao-Zhou Zhang; Noppadon Sathitsuksanoh; Lee R Lynd; Y-H Percival Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Characterization of xylan utilization and discovery of a new endoxylanase in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum through targeted gene deletions.

Authors:  Kara K Podkaminer; Adam M Guss; Heather L Trajano; David A Hogsett; Lee R Lynd
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Enhanced cellulose degradation by targeted integration of a cohesin-fused β-glucosidase into the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome.

Authors:  Gilad Gefen; Michael Anbar; Ely Morag; Raphael Lamed; Edward A Bayer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cellulase-xylanase synergy in designer cellulosomes for enhanced degradation of a complex cellulosic substrate.

Authors:  Sarah Moraïs; Yoav Barak; Jonathan Caspi; Yitzhak Hadar; Raphael Lamed; Yuval Shoham; David B Wilson; Edward A Bayer
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Engineering of family-5 glycoside hydrolase (Cel5A) from an uncultured bacterium for efficient hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates.

Authors:  Amar A Telke; Ningning Zhuang; Sunil S Ghatge; Sook-Hee Lee; Asad Ali Shah; Haji Khan; Youngsoon Um; Hyun-Dong Shin; Young Ryun Chung; Kon Ho Lee; Seon-Won Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.