Literature DB >> 20348232

3-methylcholanthrene induces differential recruitment of aryl hydrocarbon receptor to human promoters.

Andrea Pansoy1, Shaimaa Ahmed, Eivind Valen, Albin Sandelin, Jason Matthews.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated protein that mediates the toxic actions of polycyclic aromatic and halogenated compounds. Identifying genes directly regulated by AHR is important in understanding the pathways regulated by this receptor. Here we used the techniques of chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA microarrays (ChIP-chip) to detect AHR-bound genomic regions after 3-methylcholanthrene (3MC) treatment of T-47D human breast cancer cells. We identified 241 AHR-3MC-bound regions, and transcription factor-binding site analysis revealed a strong overrepresentation of the AHR-responsive element. Conventional ChIP confirmed recruitment of AHR to 26 regions with target gene responses to 3MC varying from activation to inhibition to having no effect. A comparison of identified AHR-3MC-bound regions with AHR-2,3,7,8-tetrchlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-bound regions from our previous study (Ahmed, S., Valen, E., Sandelin, A., and Matthews, J. (2009). Toxicol. Sci. 111, 254-266) revealed that 127 regions were common between the data sets. Time course ChIPs for six of the regions showed that 3MC induced gene-specific changes in histone H3 acetylation and methylation and induced differential oscillatory binding of AHR, with a periodicity between 1.5 and 2 h. Re-treatment of cells with 3MC failed to alter the oscillatory binding profiles of AHR or aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator. Cells became responsive to 3MC but not TCDD after 24 h of exposure to 3MC, highlighting important differences in AHR responsiveness between the two ligands. Our results reveal a number of novel AHR-bound promoter regions and target genes that exhibit differential kinetic binding profiles and regulation by AHR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20348232      PMCID: PMC5148624          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  39 in total

Review 1.  The PAS superfamily: sensors of environmental and developmental signals.

Authors:  Y Z Gu; J B Hogenesch; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.820

2.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated transcription: ligand-dependent recruitment of estrogen receptor alpha to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-responsive promoters.

Authors:  Jason Matthews; Björn Wihlén; Jane Thomsen; Jan-Ake Gustafsson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The genome landscape of ERalpha- and ERbeta-binding DNA regions.

Authors:  Yawen Liu; Hui Gao; Troels Torben Marstrand; Anders Ström; Eivind Valen; Albin Sandelin; Jan-Ake Gustafsson; Karin Dahlman-Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor constitutively represses c-myc transcription in human mammary tumor cells.

Authors:  Xinhai Yang; Donghui Liu; Tessa J Murray; Geoffrey C Mitchell; Eli V Hesterman; Sibel I Karchner; Rebeka R Merson; Mark E Hahn; David H Sherr
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  The transcriptional signature of dioxin in human hepatoma HepG2 cells.

Authors:  A Puga; A Maier; M Medvedovic
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Roles of coactivator proteins in dioxin induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Robert T Taylor; Feng Wang; Erin L Hsu; Oliver Hankinson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  HDAC1 bound to the Cyp1a1 promoter blocks histone acetylation associated with Ah receptor-mediated trans-activation.

Authors:  Michael Schnekenburger; Li Peng; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-07-20

8.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor splice variants in the dioxin-resistant rat: tissue expression and transactivational activity.

Authors:  Ivy D Moffat; Steven Roblin; Patricia A Harper; Allan B Okey; Raimo Pohjanvirta
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Constitutive regulation of CYP1B1 by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in pre-malignant and malignant mammary tissue.

Authors:  Xinhai Yang; Sandra Solomon; Lauren R Fraser; Anthony F Trombino; Donghui Liu; Gail E Sonenshein; Eli V Hestermann; David H Sherr
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 4.429

10.  Asap: a framework for over-representation statistics for transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Troels T Marstrand; Jes Frellsen; Ida Moltke; Martin Thiim; Eivind Valen; Dorota Retelska; Anders Krogh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparisons of differential gene expression elicited by TCDD, PCB126, βNF, or ICZ in mouse hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 cells and C57BL/6 mouse liver.

Authors:  Rance Nault; Agnes L Forgacs; Edward Dere; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependence of dioxin's effects on constitutive mouse hepatic cytochromes P450 and growth hormone signaling components.

Authors:  Chunja Lee; David S Riddick
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.273

3.  Ah Receptor Pathway Intricacies; Signaling Through Diverse Protein Partners and DNA-Motifs.

Authors:  D P Jackson; A D Joshi; C J Elferink
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  3-methylcholanthrene induces differential recruitment of aryl hydrocarbon receptor to human promoters.

Authors:  Stephen Safe
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Exactly the same but different: promiscuity and diversity in the molecular mechanisms of action of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor.

Authors:  Michael S Denison; Anatoly A Soshilov; Guochun He; Danica E DeGroot; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Differential consequences of two distinct AhR ligands on innate and adaptive immune responses to influenza A virus.

Authors:  Jennifer L H Wheeler; Kyle C Martin; Emily Resseguie; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  AhR Activation Leads to Massive Mobilization of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells with Immunosuppressive Activity through Regulation of CXCR2 and MicroRNA miR-150-5p and miR-543-3p That Target Anti-Inflammatory Genes.

Authors:  Wurood Hantoosh Neamah; Narendra P Singh; Hasan Alghetaa; Osama A Abdulla; Saurabh Chatterjee; Philip B Busbee; Mitzi Nagarkatti; Prakash Nagarkatti
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Integration of genome-wide computation DRE search, AhR ChIP-chip and gene expression analyses of TCDD-elicited responses in the mouse liver.

Authors:  Edward Dere; Raymond Lo; Trine Celius; Jason Matthews; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor and TiPARP (ARTD14) use similar, but also distinct mechanisms to repress aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling.

Authors:  Laura MacPherson; Shaimaa Ahmed; Laura Tamblyn; Jean Krutmann; Irmgard Förster; Heike Weighardt; Jason Matthews
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.