Literature DB >> 20348165

Cross border reproductive care in six European countries.

F Shenfield1, J de Mouzon, G Pennings, A P Ferraretti, A Nyboe Andersen, G de Wert, V Goossens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The quantity and the reasons for seeking cross border reproductive care are unknown. The present article provides a picture of this activity in six selected European countries receiving patients.
METHODS: Data were collected from 46 ART centres, participating voluntarily in six European countries receiving cross border patients. All treated patients treated in these centres during one calendar month filled out an individual questionnaire containing their major socio-demographic characteristics, the treatment sought and their reasons for seeking treatment outside their country of residence.
RESULTS: In total, 1230 forms were obtained from the six countries: 29.7% from Belgium, 20.5% from Czech Republic, 12.5% from Denmark, 5.3% from Slovenia, 15.7% from Spain and 16.3% from Switzerland. Patients originated from 49 different countries. Among the cross border patients participating, almost two-thirds came from four countries: Italy (31.8%), Germany (14.4%), The Netherlands (12.1%) and France (8.7%). The mean age of the participants was 37.3 years for all countries (range 21-51 years), 69.9% were married and 90% were heterosexual. Their reasons for crossing international borders for treatment varied by countries of origin: legal reasons were predominant for patients travelling from Italy (70.6%), Germany (80.2%), France (64.5%), Norway (71.6%) and Sweden (56.6%). Better access to treatment than in country of origin was more often noted for UK patients (34.0%) than for other nationalities. Quality was an important factor for patients from most countries.
CONCLUSIONS: The cross border phenomenon is now well entrenched. The data show that many patients travel to evade restrictive legislation in their own country, and that support from their home health providers is variable. There may be a need for professional societies to establish standards for cross border reproductive care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20348165     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  33 in total

1.  The accidental medical tourist.

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; David N Fisman
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Clinical ethics and values: how do norms evolve from practice?

Authors:  Marta Spranzi
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-02

Review 3.  Ethical issues and law-making power: how European case law has rewritten Italian law on medically assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Roberto Cippitani
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-10

4.  Maximum number of children per sperm donor based on false paternity rate.

Authors:  Isabel M Sánchez-Castelló; María C Gonzalvo; Ana Clavero; María L López-Regalado; Juan Mozas; Luis Martínez-Granados; Purificación Navas; José A Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Attitudes towards cross-border reproductive care among infertile Japanese patients.

Authors:  Yuri Hibino; Yosuke Shimazono; Yasuhiro Kambayashi; Yoshiaki Hitomi; Hiroyuki Nakamura
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 6.  A transportation network for human ovarian tissue is indispensable to success for fertility preservation.

Authors:  K Kyono; T Hashimoto; M Toya; M Koizumi; C Sasaki; S Shibasaki; N Aono; Y Nakamura; R Obata; N Okuyama; Y Ogura; H Igarashi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).

Authors:  Mahmoud Salama; Vladimir Isachenko; Evgenia Isachenko; Gohar Rahimi; Peter Mallmann; Lynn M Westphal; Marcia C Inhorn; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Live-Birth Rate Associated With Repeat In Vitro Fertilization Treatment Cycles.

Authors:  Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor; Andrew D A C Smith; Kate Tilling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Twin Peaks: more twinning in humans than ever before.

Authors:  Christiaan Monden; Gilles Pison; Jeroen Smits
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Ten years of fertility treatment experience and reproductive options in transgender men.

Authors:  Isabelle Stuyver; Sara Somers; Veerle Provoost; Katrien Wierckx; Hans Verstraelen; Elia Wyverkens; Lien Van Glabeke; Guy T'Sjoen; Ann Buysse; Guido Pennings; Petra De Sutter
Journal:  Int J Transgend Health       Date:  2020-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.