Literature DB >> 20347617

Inciting events associated with lumbar disc herniation.

Pradeep Suri1, David J Hunter, Cristin Jouve, Carol Hartigan, Janet Limke, Enrique Pena, Bryan Swaim, Ling Li, James Rainville.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: No prior study has investigated the frequency of patient-identified inciting events in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) or their clinical significance.
PURPOSE: To examine the clinical frequency of patient-identified inciting events in LDH, and to identify associations between the presence of inciting events and the severity of the clinical presentation. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of data from a cohort study with prospective recruitment, with retrospective data collection on inciting events. The setting was a hospital-based specialty spine clinic. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred fifty-four adults with lumbosacral radicular pain and LDH confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report measures of disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain, and the VAS for back pain.
METHODS: Dependent variables included the presence of a patient-identified inciting event, which were categorized as spontaneous onset, nonlifting physical activity, heavy lifting (>35 lbs), light lifting (<35 lbs), nonexertional occurrence, or physical trauma. We examined the association of an inciting event, or a lifting-related event, with each outcome, first using univariate analyses, and second using multivariate modeling, accounting for important adjustment variables.
RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of LDH did not have a specific patient-identified event associated with onset of symptoms. Nonlifting activities were the most common inciting event, comprising 26% of all LDH. Heavy lifting (6.5%), light lifting (2%), nonexertional occurrences (2%), and physical trauma (1.3%) accounted for relatively small proportions of all LDH. Patient-identified inciting events were not significantly associated with a more severe clinical presentation in crude analyses. Spontaneous LDH was significantly associated with higher baseline ODI scores in multivariate analysis, although the magnitude of this effect was small. There were no significant associations (p< or =.05) between the presence of a lifting-associated event and the outcomes of ODI, VAS leg pain, or VAS back pain.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of LDH occurred without specific inciting events. A history of an inciting event was not significantly associated with a more severe clinical presentation. There was no significant association between the occurrence of a lifting-related event and the severity of the clinical presentation. This information may be useful in the counseling of patients recovering from acute LDH. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20347617      PMCID: PMC2919742          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  23 in total

1.  An epidemiological study of acute herniated lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  J L Kelsey
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1975-08

2.  Occupational driving and lumbar disc degeneration: a case-control study.

Authors:  Michele C Battié; Tapio Videman; Laura E Gibbons; Hannu Manninen; Kevin Gill; Malcolm Pope; Jaakko Kaprio
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-11-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Leisure time physical activities and the results of surgery of lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  H Alaranta; M Hurme; S L Karppi
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1987

4.  Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain?

Authors:  E M Hagen; H R Eriksen; H Ursin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Individual factors, occupational loading, and physical exercise as predictors of sciatic pain.

Authors:  Helena Miranda; Eira Viikari-Juntura; Rami Martikainen; Esa-Pekka Takala; Hilkka Riihimäki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A Indahl; L Velund; O Reikeraas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Incidence of sciatic pain among men in machine operating, dynamic physical work, and sedentary work. A three-year follow-up.

Authors:  H Riihimäki; E Viikari-Juntura; G Moneta; J Kuha; T Videman; S Tola
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  An epidemiological study of the relationship between occupations and acute herniated lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  J L Kelsey
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Back and leg complaints in relation to muscle strength in young men.

Authors:  M J Karvonen; J T Viitasalo; P V Komi; J Nummi; T Järvinen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1980
View more
  2 in total

1.  The cellular and molecular biology of the intervertebral disc: A clinician's primer.

Authors:  W Mark Erwin; Katherine E Hood
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-09

2.  Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding.

Authors:  Saman Madinei; Xiaopeng Ning
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.778

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.