Julie Bynum1, Yunjie Song, Elliott Fisher. 1. Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. julie.bynum@dartmouth.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men aged 80 and older in Medicare and to examine geographic variation in screening rates across the U.S. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of variation across hospital referral regions using administrative data. SETTING: National random sample in fee-for-service Medicare. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries aged 80 and older in 2003. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of men aged 80 and older screened using the PSA test. RESULTS: The national rate of PSA screening in men aged 80 and older was 17.2%, but there was wide variation across regions (<2-38%). Higher PSA screening in a region was positively associated with greater total costs (correlation coefficient (r)=0.49, P<.001), greater intensive care unit use at the end of life (r=0.46, P<.001), and greater number of unique physicians seen (r=0.36, P<.001). PSA screening was negatively associated with proportion of beneficiaries using a primary care physician as opposed to a medical subspecialist for the predominance of ambulatory care (r=-0.38, P<.001). CONCLUSION: PSA screening in men aged 80 and older is common practice, although its frequency is highly variable across the United States. Its association with fragmented physician care and aggressive end-of-life care may reflect less reliance on primary care and consequent difficulty informing patients of the potential harms and low likelihood of benefit of this procedure.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men aged 80 and older in Medicare and to examine geographic variation in screening rates across the U.S. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of variation across hospital referral regions using administrative data. SETTING: National random sample in fee-for-service Medicare. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries aged 80 and older in 2003. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of men aged 80 and older screened using the PSA test. RESULTS: The national rate of PSA screening in men aged 80 and older was 17.2%, but there was wide variation across regions (<2-38%). Higher PSA screening in a region was positively associated with greater total costs (correlation coefficient (r)=0.49, P<.001), greater intensive care unit use at the end of life (r=0.46, P<.001), and greater number of unique physicians seen (r=0.36, P<.001). PSA screening was negatively associated with proportion of beneficiaries using a primary care physician as opposed to a medical subspecialist for the predominance of ambulatory care (r=-0.38, P<.001). CONCLUSION:PSA screening in men aged 80 and older is common practice, although its frequency is highly variable across the United States. Its association with fragmented physician care and aggressive end-of-life care may reflect less reliance on primary care and consequent difficulty informing patients of the potential harms and low likelihood of benefit of this procedure.
Authors: Brenda Sirovich; Patricia M Gallagher; David E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: M B Hamel; J Lynn; J M Teno; K E Covinsky; A W Wu; A Galanos; N A Desbiens; R S Phillips Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Mick P Couper; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Carrie A Levin; Mary McNaughton-Collins; Deborah L Helitzer; John VanHoewyk; Michael J Barry Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-09-28
Authors: Denise L Anthony; M Brooke Herndon; Patricia M Gallagher; Amber E Barnato; Julie P W Bynum; Daniel J Gottlieb; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Vincenzo Mirone; Ciro Imbimbo; Davide Arcaniolo; Marco Franco; Roberto La Rocca; Luca Venturino; Lorenzo Spirito; Massimiliano Creta; Paolo Verze Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-08-05 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Danil V Makarov; Pamela R Soulos; Heather T Gold; James B Yu; Sounok Sen; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Amy S Kelley; Anthony L Back; Robert M Arnold; Gabrielle R Goldberg; Betty B Lim; Evgenia Litrivis; Cardinale B Smith; Lynn B O'Neill Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Cynthia So; Katharine A Kirby; Kala Mehta; Richard M Hoffman; Adam A Powell; Stephen J Freedland; Brenda Sirovich; Elizabeth M Yano; Louise C Walter Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-12-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Louise C Walter; Kathy Z Fung; Katharine A Kirby; Ying Shi; Roxanne Espaldon; Sarah O'Brien; Stephen J Freedland; Adam A Powell; Richard M Hoffman Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 21.873