Literature DB >> 20345867

Variation in prostate-specific antigen screening in men aged 80 and older in fee-for-service Medicare.

Julie Bynum1, Yunjie Song, Elliott Fisher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men aged 80 and older in Medicare and to examine geographic variation in screening rates across the U.S.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of variation across hospital referral regions using administrative data.
SETTING: National random sample in fee-for-service Medicare. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries aged 80 and older in 2003. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of men aged 80 and older screened using the PSA test.
RESULTS: The national rate of PSA screening in men aged 80 and older was 17.2%, but there was wide variation across regions (<2-38%). Higher PSA screening in a region was positively associated with greater total costs (correlation coefficient (r)=0.49, P<.001), greater intensive care unit use at the end of life (r=0.46, P<.001), and greater number of unique physicians seen (r=0.36, P<.001). PSA screening was negatively associated with proportion of beneficiaries using a primary care physician as opposed to a medical subspecialist for the predominance of ambulatory care (r=-0.38, P<.001).
CONCLUSION: PSA screening in men aged 80 and older is common practice, although its frequency is highly variable across the United States. Its association with fragmented physician care and aggressive end-of-life care may reflect less reliance on primary care and consequent difficulty informing patients of the potential harms and low likelihood of benefit of this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20345867      PMCID: PMC2930768          DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02761.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  37 in total

1.  Knowledge, attitudes, and screening practices among older men regarding prostate cancer.

Authors:  C B Steele; D S Miller; C Maylahn; R J Uhler; C T Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Are age-based criteria the best way to determine eligibility for prostate cancer screening?

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Are age-based criteria the best way to determine eligibility for prostate cancer screening?

Authors:  Manfred Gogol
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. Health care.

Authors:  Brenda Sirovich; Patricia M Gallagher; David E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT.

Authors:  M B Hamel; J Lynn; J M Teno; K E Covinsky; A W Wu; A Galanos; N A Desbiens; R S Phillips
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA).

Authors: 
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Use of the prostate-specific antigen test among U.S. men: findings from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Louie E Ross; Zahava Berkowitz; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Mick P Couper; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Carrie A Levin; Mary McNaughton-Collins; Deborah L Helitzer; John VanHoewyk; Michael J Barry
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-28

10.  How much do patients' preferences contribute to resource use?

Authors:  Denise L Anthony; M Brooke Herndon; Patricia M Gallagher; Amber E Barnato; Julie P W Bynum; Daniel J Gottlieb; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  20 in total

1.  Remaining Life Expectancy Measurement and PSA Screening of Older Men.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Supriya G Mohile; William Dale
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  The role of community-based participatory research to inform local health policy: a case study.

Authors:  Matthew J O'Brien; Robert C Whitaker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards prostate cancer screening amongst men living in the southern Italian peninsula: the Prevention and Research in Oncology (PRO) non-profit Foundation experience.

Authors:  Vincenzo Mirone; Ciro Imbimbo; Davide Arcaniolo; Marco Franco; Roberto La Rocca; Luca Venturino; Lorenzo Spirito; Massimiliano Creta; Paolo Verze
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Regional-Level Correlations in Inappropriate Imaging Rates for Prostate and Breast Cancers: Potential Implications for the Choosing Wisely Campaign.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Pamela R Soulos; Heather T Gold; James B Yu; Sounok Sen; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Geritalk: communication skills training for geriatric and palliative medicine fellows.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; Anthony L Back; Robert M Arnold; Gabrielle R Goldberg; Betty B Lim; Evgenia Litrivis; Cardinale B Smith; Lynn B O'Neill
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Medical center characteristics associated with PSA screening in elderly veterans with limited life expectancy.

Authors:  Cynthia So; Katharine A Kirby; Kala Mehta; Richard M Hoffman; Adam A Powell; Stephen J Freedland; Brenda Sirovich; Elizabeth M Yano; Louise C Walter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Five-year downstream outcomes following prostate-specific antigen screening in older men.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Kathy Z Fung; Katharine A Kirby; Ying Shi; Roxanne Espaldon; Sarah O'Brien; Stephen J Freedland; Adam A Powell; Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: "I think it would be strange".

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Peter H Schwartz; Laura R Holtz; Kianna Montz; Greg A Sachs
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Impact of the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation to discontinue prostate cancer screening among male Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Rong Wang; Jessica B Long; Cary P Gross; Xiaomei Ma
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-12

10.  Real-world comparative risks of herpes virus infections in tofacitinib and biologic-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Fenglong Xie; Huifeng Yun; Sasha Bernatsky; Kevin L Winthrop
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.