BACKGROUND: Cardiac auscultation is a core clinical skill. However, prior studies show that trainee skills are often deficient and that clinical experience is not a proxy for competence. OBJECTIVE: To describe a mastery model of cardiac auscultation education and evaluate its effectiveness in improving bedside cardiac auscultation skills. DESIGN: Untreated control group design with pretest and posttest. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year students who received a cardiac auscultation curriculum and fourth year students who did not. INTERVENTION: A cardiac auscultation curriculum consisting of a computer tutorial and a cardiac patient simulator. All third-year students were required to meet or exceed a minimum passing score (MPS) set by an expert panel at posttest. MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic accuracy with simulated heart sounds and actual patients. RESULTS: Trained third-year students (n = 77) demonstrated significantly higher cardiac auscultation accuracy compared to untrained fourth year students (n = 31) in assessment of simulated heart sounds (93.8% vs. 73.9%, p < 0.001) and with real patients (81.8% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.003). USMLE scores correlated modestly with a computer-based multiple choice assessment using simulated heart sounds but not with bedside skills on real patients. CONCLUSIONS: A cardiac auscultation curriculum consisting of deliberate practice with a computer-based tutorial and a cardiac patient simulator resulted in improved assessment of simulated heart sounds and more accurate examination of actual patients.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac auscultation is a core clinical skill. However, prior studies show that trainee skills are often deficient and that clinical experience is not a proxy for competence. OBJECTIVE: To describe a mastery model of cardiac auscultation education and evaluate its effectiveness in improving bedside cardiac auscultation skills. DESIGN: Untreated control group design with pretest and posttest. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year students who received a cardiac auscultation curriculum and fourth year students who did not. INTERVENTION: A cardiac auscultation curriculum consisting of a computer tutorial and a cardiac patient simulator. All third-year students were required to meet or exceed a minimum passing score (MPS) set by an expert panel at posttest. MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic accuracy with simulated heart sounds and actual patients. RESULTS: Trained third-year students (n = 77) demonstrated significantly higher cardiac auscultation accuracy compared to untrained fourth year students (n = 31) in assessment of simulated heart sounds (93.8% vs. 73.9%, p < 0.001) and with real patients (81.8% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.003). USMLE scores correlated modestly with a computer-based multiple choice assessment using simulated heart sounds but not with bedside skills on real patients. CONCLUSIONS: A cardiac auscultation curriculum consisting of deliberate practice with a computer-based tutorial and a cardiac patient simulator resulted in improved assessment of simulated heart sounds and more accurate examination of actual patients.
Authors: Eytan Szmuilowicz; Kathy J Neely; Rashmi K Sharma; Elaine R Cohen; William C McGaghie; Diane B Wayne Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Nancy M Tofil; Dawn Taylor Peterson; Julie Turner Wheeler; Amber Youngblood; J Lynn Zinkan; Diego Lara; Brett Jakaitis; Julia Niebauer; Marjorie Lee White Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2014-06
Authors: William C McGaghie; Timothy J Draycott; William F Dunn; Connie M Lopez; Dimitrios Stefanidis Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Jeffrey H Barsuk; Jane E Wilcox; Elaine R Cohen; Rebecca S Harap; Kerry B Shanklin; Kathleen L Grady; Jane S Kim; Gretchen P Nonog; Lauren E Schulze; Alison M Jirak; Diane B Wayne; Kenzie A Cameron Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2019-10-11