Literature DB >> 20339712

Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.

Ariana Pulido Guerrero1, Odilon Guariza Filho, Orlando Tanaka, Elisa Souza Camargo, Sérgio Vieira.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, frictional forces produced by ceramic brackets and arch wires of different alloys. Frictional tests were performed on three ceramic brackets: monocrystalline (Inspire ICE), polycrystalline (InVu), polycrystalline with metal slot (Clarity), and one stainless steel bracket (Dyna-Lock). Thirty brackets of each were tested, all with .022' slots, in combination with stainless steel and nickel-titanium wires .019' x .025', at 0 degrees and 10 degrees angulation, in artificial saliva. Arch wires were pulled through the slots at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min. There were statistically significant differences between the groups of brackets and wires studied (p < .05). The polycrystalline brackets with metal slots had values similar to those of conventional polycrystalline brackets, and the monocrystalline brackets had the highest frictional forces. The nickel-titanium wires produced the lowest friction. The addition of metal slots in the polycrystalline brackets did not significantly decrease frictional values. Nickel-titanium wires produced lower friction than those of stainless steel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20339712     DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000100007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  9 in total

1.  Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.

Authors:  Susanne Reimann; Christoph Bourauel; Anna Weber; Cornelius Dirk; Thomas Lietz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires covered with a polyether ether ketone tube.

Authors:  Nobukazu Shirakawa; Toshio Iwata; Shinjiro Miyake; Takero Otuka; So Koizumi; Toshitugu Kawata
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of applied moment on resistance to sliding among esthetic self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; Rick W Fuchs; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics.

Authors:  S Lalithapriya; N Kurunji Kumaran; K Rajasigamani
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

5.  In vitro evaluation of frictional forces of two ceramic orthodontic brackets versus a stainless steel bracket in combination with two types of archwires.

Authors:  Valiollah Arash; Mahmoud Rabiee; Vahid Rakhshan; Sara Khorasani; Farhad Sobouti
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Fluoride influences nickel-titanium orthodontic wires' surface texture and friction resistance.

Authors:  Mona Aly Abbassy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  A Comparative Evaluation of Canine Retraction Using Ceramic Bracket and Ceramic Bracket with Metal Slot with Conventional Preadjusted Edgewise Appliance Bracket Systems: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Junaid Ahmed Shaik; Guneet Guram
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-07-18

8.  Friction forces during sliding of various brackets for malaligned teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Vito Crincoli; Letizia Perillo; Maria Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Antonio Balsamo; Vitaliano Serpico; Francesco Chiatante; Carmine Pappalettere; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-28

9.  Evaluation of Static Friction of Polycrystalline Ceramic Brackets after Conditioning with Different Powers of Er:YAG Laser.

Authors:  Valiollah Arash; Saeed Javanmard; Zeinab Eftekhari; Manouchehr Rahmati-Kamel; Mohammad Bahadoram
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-09-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.