| Literature DB >> 20339565 |
Kwaku Poku Asante1, Ruth Owusu, David Dosoo, Elizabeth Awini, George Adjei, Seeba Amenga Etego, Daniel Chandramohan, Seth Owusu-Agyei.
Abstract
Introduction. To enhance effective treatment, african nations including Ghana changed its malaria treatment policy from monotherapy to combination treatment with artesunate-amodiaquine (AS+AQ). The major challenge to its use in loose form is adherence. Objective. The objectives of this study were to investigate adherence and treatment outcome among patients treated with AS+AQ combination therapy for acute uncomplicated malaria. Methodology. The study was conducted in two rural districts located in the middle belt of Ghana using quantitative methods. Patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated malaria as per the Ghana Ministry of Health malaria case definitions were randomly allocated to one of two groups. All patients in both groups were educated about the dose regimen of AS+AQ therapy and the need for adherence. Treatment with AS+AQ was supervised in one group while the other group was not supervised. Adherence was assessed by direct observation of the blister package of AS+AQ left on day 2. Results. 401 participants were randomized into the supervised (211) and unsupervised (190) groups. Compliance in both supervised (95.7%) and unsupervised (92.6%) groups were similar (P = .18). The commonest side-effects reported on day 2 among both groups were headaches, and body weakness. Parasite clearance by day 28 was >95% in both groups. Discussion/Conclusions. Administration of AS-AQ in both groups resulted in high levels of adherence to treatment regimen among adolescent and adult population in central Ghana. It appears that high level of adherence to AS-AQ is achievable through a rigorous education programme during routine clinic visits.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20339565 PMCID: PMC2836893 DOI: 10.1155/2009/529583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Trop Med ISSN: 1687-9686
Figure 1Flow diagram of patient recruitment and follow up.
Age, sex, and educational characteristics of study participants.
| Supervised % ( | Unsupervised % ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of respondents | 211 | 190 |
| Mean age, years (95% CI) | 38.1 (37.7–40.4), | 39.5 (37.1–41.9) |
| Sex | ||
| Males | 34.6 (73) | 36.8 (70) |
| Females | 65.4 (138) | 63.2 (120) |
| Educational background | ||
| None | 44.5 (94) | 53.7 (102) |
| Primary | 20.9 (44) | 16.8 (32) |
| Middle school, JSS | 29.4 (62) | 27.4 (52) |
| Technical/commercial/SSS/post Sec | 5.2 (11) | 2.1 (4) |
| Physical Examination | ||
| Mean weight, Kg (95% CI) | 49.6 (48.5–50.7) | 49.7 (48.7–50.7) |
| Mean temperature (95% CI) | 37.9 (37.8–38.0) | 38.0 (37.9–38.0) |
| Biochemical | ||
| Proportion with sexual parasite (%) | 2.4 (5/211) | 3.2 (6/190) |
| Mean hemoglobin, g/dL (95% CI) | 12.4 (12.1–12.6) | 12.4 (11.4–13.3) |
| Geometric mean ALT, U/L (95% CI) | 9.0 (7.9, 10.2) | 8.7 (7.6, 10.1) |
| Geometric mean AST, U/L (95% CI) | 35.0 (32.9, 37.1) | 35.9 (33.6, 38.3) |
| Geometric mean TBil, | 12.2 (11.1, 13.5) | 11.6 (10.3, 13.1) |
| Geometric mean Ure, mmol/L (95% CI) | 3.1 (2.9, 3.3) | 2.8 (2.6, 3.0) |
| Geometric mean Cre, | 68.8 (66.2, 71.5) | 67.7 (65.4, 70.1) |
ALT : Alanine transaminase, AST : Aspartate transaminase, TBil : Total transaminase, Ure : Urea, Cre = Creatinine, 95% CI : 95% Confidence Interval.
Predictors of adherence to artesunate-amodiaqiune treatment.
| Factor | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Group | ||
| Unsupervised | 1.00 | |
| Supervised | 1.82 (0.76, 4.33) | .18 |
| Sex | ||
| Women | 1.00 | |
| Men | 0.93 (0.38 2.26) | .87 |
| Age group | ||
| age-groups >20 | 1.00 | |
| age-groups ≤20 | 1.25 (0.34, 4.57) | .76 |
| Education | ||
| Education | 1.00 | |
| No Educated | 1.36 (0.55,3.56) | .51 |
Reported side-effects within 7 day post first dose.
| Symptom | Day 1* | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 7 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sup. | Sup. | Unsup. |
| Sup. | Unsup. |
| Sup. | Unsup. |
| ||
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||||||
| Headache | 11.2 | — | 10.6 | 16.4 | .12 | 7.3 | 11.5 | .44 | 2.8 | 1.8 | .56 |
| Body weakness | 15.5 | — | 13.6 | 7.9 | .20 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0.9 | 1.1 | .87 |
| Bodily pain | 8.0 | — | 9.9 | 6.5 | .22 | 5.7 | 8.8 | .48 | 2.5 | 3.3 | .64 |
| Joint pain | 6.6 | — | 8.0 | 10.4 | .43 | 4.9 | 10.8 | .22 | 4.0 | 1.7 | .17 |
| Drowsiness | 5.1 | — | 4.2 | 7.8 | .26 | 0.0 | 3.3 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
| Uncontrollable body mov't | 2.0 | — | 10.3 | 5.9 | .11 | 5.4 | 5.7 | .94 | 2.0 | 2.2 | .89 |
| Nausea | 1.0 | — | 2.9 | 3.0 | .92 | 4.4 | 2.7 | .57 | 1.5 | 3.6 | .17 |
| Abdominal pain | 2.4 | — | 3.3 | 2.1 | .46 | 1.3 | 1.4 | .98 | 1.9 | 3.7 | .27 |
| Itching | 1.4 | — | 0.0 | 2.0 | — | 1.3 | 0.0 | .32 | 1.9 | 2.6 | .63 |
| Difficulty in sleeping | 1.4 | — | 3.3 | 1.0 | <.01 | 2.7 | 1.4 | .57 | 3.3 | 6.3 | .15 |
| Lost of appetite | 0.9 | — | 3.7 | 3.1 | .72 | 6.6 | 3.9 | .46 | 3.7 | 2.6 | .51 |
| Diarrhoea | 0.0 | — | 2.3 | 1.0 | .32 | 0.0 | 1.4 | — | 1.8 | 3.1 | .40 |
| Palpitation | 0.9 | — | 1.4 | 0.5 | .38 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0.9 | 1.0 | .89 |
| Rash | 0.5 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | .93 |
| Vomiting | 0.0 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | .94 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
*Unsupervised group were not assessed on day 1, Sup : supervised group; Unsup : Unsupervised group; Ave : average of supervised and unsupervised groups.
Proportion of participants with high (≥ grade 3 CTCAE v3 classification) haematological and biochemical indices at Days 0 and 2.
| Biochemical assessment | Day 0 | Day 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supervised | Unsupervised |
| Supervised | Unsupervised |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Hemoglobin | 1 (0.47) | 3 (1.58) | .26 | 3 (1.42) | 5 (2.63) | .07 |
| Alanine transaminase | 1 (0.54) | 1 (0.60) | .94 | 1 (0.54) | 1 (0.60) | .94 |
| Aspartate transaminase | 1 (0.48) | 2 (1.06) | .50 | 0 (0.00) | 3 (1.96) | — |
| Total bilirubin | 4 (1.96) | 3 (1.62) | .25 | 4 (2.06) | 7 (4.02) | .27 |
| Urea | 1 (0.48) | 1 (0.53) | .94 | 7 (3.72) | 4 (2.34) | .45 |
| Creatinine | 3 (1.42) | 1 (0.53) | .37 | 23 (11.22) | 16 (8.74) | .44 |
Note: The proportion of high creatinine was similar among the two groups at days 0 and 2; there was a significant increase by Day 2 compared with day 0 among both supervised (P < .01) and unsupervised (P ≤ .01) groups.