Literature DB >> 20338253

Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders.

M Mazaheri1, M Salavati, H Negahban, S M Sohani, F Taghizadeh, A Feizi, A Karimi, M Parnianpour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To translate the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) into Persian and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of FAAM.
METHODS: 93 patients with a range of foot and ankle disorders, completed the Persian version of the FAAM and Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) in the test session. With an interval of 2-6 days, 60 patients filled out the FAAM in the retest session. The FAAM is composed of two subscales including activities of daily living (ADL) and SPORTS. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (s.e.m.), item internal consistency and discriminant validity using Spearman's correlation coefficient and construct validity using Spearman's correlation coefficient and Independent t-test.
RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.97 and 0.94 was obtained for ADL and SPORTS subscales, respectively. The ICC and s.e.m. were 0.98 and 3.13 for ADL and 0.98 and 3.53 for SPORTS subscale. Items were stronger measures of their hypothesized subscale than of other subscale. The ADL and SPORTS subscales had stronger correlation with SF-36 physical function (r=0.60, 0.53) and physical health summary measure (r=0.61, 0.48) than with SF-36 mental health (r=0.21, 0.10) and mental health summary measure (r=0.36, 0.27). A high correlation was found between FAAM scores and global scale of functional status for SPORTS (r=0.73) but not for ADL (r=0.42). FAAM scores were greater in individuals who rated their function as normal or nearly normal compared with those who rated as abnormal or severely abnormal for SPORTS (P=0.04) but not for ADL (P=0.15).
CONCLUSION: The Persian version of FAAM is a reliable and valid measure to quantify physical functioning in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Copyright 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20338253     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  23 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure.

Authors:  Hanneke Weel; Ruben Zwiers; Donija Azim; Inger N Sierevelt; Daniel Haverkamp; C Niek van Dijk; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases.

Authors:  Yuanxi Jia; Hsiaomin Huang; Joel J Gagnier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure.

Authors:  Daisuke Uematsu; Hidetomo Suzuki; Shogo Sasaki; Yasuharu Nagano; Nobuyuki Shinozuka; Norihiko Sunagawa; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The Persian version of locomotor capabilities index: translation, reliability and validity in individuals with lower limb amputation.

Authors:  Mahyar Salavati; Masood Mazaheri; Fatemeh Khosrozadeh; Seyed Mohammad Ebrahim Mousavi; Hossein Negahban; Hadi Shojaei
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Alberto J Pérez-Panero; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Raúl Fernández-Torres; Cynthia Formosa; Alfred Gatt; Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).

Authors:  Derya Çelik; Melih Malkoç; RobRoy Martin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Scarf and Chevron Osteotomies and the McBride Procedure in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity.

Authors:  Mohammad Fakoor; Naser Sarafan; Payam Mohammadhoseini; Mohsen Khorami; Hamidreza Arti; SeyedShahnam Mosavi; Amir Aghaeeaghdam
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 8.  Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review.

Authors:  I N Sierevelt; R Zwiers; W Schats; D Haverkamp; C B Terwee; P A Nolte; G M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Ultrasound-Guided Injection of High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid versus Corticosteroid in Management of Plantar Fasciitis: A 24-Week Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat; Farshad Nouri; Mahtab Darvish; Hadi Esmaily; Parsa Ghazihosseini
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  An Investigation of Knee Injury Profiles among Iranian Elite Karatekas: Observations from a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hamidreza Naserpour; Julien S Baker; Amir Letafatkar; Giacomo Rossettini; Frédéric Dutheil
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.