Literature DB >> 20338191

Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry.

David Alais1, Jeroen J van Boxtel, Amanda Parker, Raymond van Ee.   

Abstract

A previous study has shown that diverting attention from binocular rivalry to a visual distractor task results in a slowing of rivalry alternation rate between simple orthogonal orientations. Here, we investigate whether the slowing of visual perceptual alternations will occur when attention is diverted to an auditory distractor task, and we extend the investigation by testing this for two kinds of binocular rivalry stimuli and for the Necker cube. Our results show that doing the auditory attention task does indeed slow visual perceptual alternations, that the slowing effect is a graded function of attentional load, and that the attentional slowing effect is less pronounced for grating rivalry than for house/face rivalry and for the Necker cube. These results are explained in terms of supramodal attentional resources modulating a high-level interpretative process in perceptual ambiguity, together with a role for feedback to early visual processes in the case of binocular rivalry. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20338191     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

Review 1.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  When audiovisual correspondence disturbs visual processing.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Won Mok Shim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Binocular rivalry transitions predict inattention symptom severity in adult ADHD.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Natalia Zaretskaya; Nina Maria Höhnle; Andreas Bartels; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Jens Sommer; Andreas Jansen; Marnix Naber; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness?

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Jan Brascamp; David J Heeger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Bilinguals' inhibitory control and attentional processes in a visual perceptual task.

Authors:  Marina C Wimmer; Christina Marx; Steven Stirk; Peter J B Hancock
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-07

9.  Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Laila Hugrass; David Crewther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Touch interacts with vision during binocular rivalry with a tight orientation tuning.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.