BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine has opposing effects on the cardiovascular system. Action in the central nervous system produces sympatholysis and a reduction in blood pressure, while peripherally it causes vasoconstriction leading to an increase in blood pressure. The purpose of our study is to define the concentration-response profile for these hemodynamic effects in children after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A simultaneous pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of data from 29 children given a single bolus of dexmedetomidine 1-4 mcg.kg(-1) following cardiac surgery was undertaken using mixed effects modeling. There were four dexmedetomidine concentrations available from each patient, and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was recorded electronically every 5 min for 5 h after drug administration. A composite Emax model was used to relate mean arterial pressure changes to plasma dexmedetomidine concentration. RESULTS: Children had a mean age of 2.67 years (range 4 days-14 years) and a mean weight of 12.34 (range 3.4-48.4) kg. The peripheral vasopressor effect was directly related to plasma concentration with an Emax(pos) of 50.3 (CV 44.50%) mmHg, EC(50pos) 1.1 (48.27%) microg.l(-1) and a Hill(pos) coefficient of 1.65. The delayed central sympatholytic response was described with an Emax(neg) of -12.30 (CV 37.01%) mmHg, EC(50neg) 0.10 (104.40%) microg.l(-1) and a Hill(neg) coefficient of 2.35. The equilibration half-time (T(1/2)keo) was 9.66 (165.23%) min. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine administered as a single bolus dose following cardiac surgery produces a biphasic effect on MAP. A plasma dexmedetomidine concentration of above 1.0 microg.l(-1) was associated with a 20% increase in MAP in this specific cohort. A dosage regimen involving a small bolus dose (0.5 microg.kg(-1)) followed by a continuous infusion should be used to avoid initial increases in MAP.
BACKGROUND:Dexmedetomidine has opposing effects on the cardiovascular system. Action in the central nervous system produces sympatholysis and a reduction in blood pressure, while peripherally it causes vasoconstriction leading to an increase in blood pressure. The purpose of our study is to define the concentration-response profile for these hemodynamic effects in children after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A simultaneous pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of data from 29 children given a single bolus of dexmedetomidine 1-4 mcg.kg(-1) following cardiac surgery was undertaken using mixed effects modeling. There were four dexmedetomidine concentrations available from each patient, and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was recorded electronically every 5 min for 5 h after drug administration. A composite Emax model was used to relate mean arterial pressure changes to plasma dexmedetomidine concentration. RESULTS:Children had a mean age of 2.67 years (range 4 days-14 years) and a mean weight of 12.34 (range 3.4-48.4) kg. The peripheral vasopressor effect was directly related to plasma concentration with an Emax(pos) of 50.3 (CV 44.50%) mmHg, EC(50pos) 1.1 (48.27%) microg.l(-1) and a Hill(pos) coefficient of 1.65. The delayed central sympatholytic response was described with an Emax(neg) of -12.30 (CV 37.01%) mmHg, EC(50neg) 0.10 (104.40%) microg.l(-1) and a Hill(neg) coefficient of 2.35. The equilibration half-time (T(1/2)keo) was 9.66 (165.23%) min. CONCLUSIONS:Dexmedetomidine administered as a single bolus dose following cardiac surgery produces a biphasic effect on MAP. A plasma dexmedetomidine concentration of above 1.0 microg.l(-1) was associated with a 20% increase in MAP in this specific cohort. A dosage regimen involving a small bolus dose (0.5 microg.kg(-1)) followed by a continuous infusion should be used to avoid initial increases in MAP.
Authors: K P Mason; E R Kelhoffer; R Prescilla; M Mehta; J C Root; V J Young; F Robinson; R A Veselis Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: M Ezzati; K Broad; G Kawano; S Faulkner; J Hassell; B Fleiss; P Gressens; I Fierens; J Rostami; M Maze; J W Sleigh; B Anderson; R D Sanders; N J Robertson Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 2.105