Pekka Talke1, Brian J Anderson2. 1. University of California San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MUE455, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. 2. University of Auckland, Private Bag 92024, Auckland, 1001, New Zealand.
Abstract
AIMS: Alpha-2 agonists are direct peripheral vasoconstrictors, which achieve these effects by activating vascular smooth muscle alpha-2 adrenoceptors. The impact of this response during dexmedetomidine infusion remains poorly quantified. Our goal was to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD, vasoconstriction) effects of a computer-controlled dexmedetomidine infusion in healthy volunteers. METHODS: After local ethics committee approval, we studied 10 healthy volunteers. To study the peripheral vasoconstrictive effect of dexmedetomidine without concurrent sympatholytic effects, sympathetic fibres were blocked with a brachial plexus block. Volunteers received a dexmedetomidine target-controlled infusion for 15 min, to a target concentration of 0.3 ng ml-1 . Arterial blood samples were collected during and for 60 min after dexmedetomidine infusion for PK analysis. Peripheral vasoconstriction (PD) was assessed using finger photoelectric plethysmography. PK/PD analysis was carried out using nonlinear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: We found that the computer-controlled infusion pump delivered mean concentrations greater than 0.3 ng ml-1 over the 15-min infusion duration. The peripheral vasoconstrictive effect correlated with dexmedetomidine plasma concentrations during and after the infusion. A three-compartment model provided a better fit to the data than a two-compartment model. CONCLUSIONS: We found that dexmedetomidine-induced vasoconstriction is concentration dependent over time. Dexmedetomidine PK were best estimated by a three-compartment model with allometric scaling. Our results may contribute to future modelling of dexmedetomidine-induced haemodynamic effects.
AIMS: Alpha-2 agonists are direct peripheral vasoconstrictors, which achieve these effects by activating vascular smooth muscle alpha-2 adrenoceptors. The impact of this response during dexmedetomidine infusion remains poorly quantified. Our goal was to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD, vasoconstriction) effects of a computer-controlled dexmedetomidine infusion in healthy volunteers. METHODS: After local ethics committee approval, we studied 10 healthy volunteers. To study the peripheral vasoconstrictive effect of dexmedetomidine without concurrent sympatholytic effects, sympathetic fibres were blocked with a brachial plexus block. Volunteers received a dexmedetomidine target-controlled infusion for 15 min, to a target concentration of 0.3 ng ml-1 . Arterial blood samples were collected during and for 60 min after dexmedetomidine infusion for PK analysis. Peripheral vasoconstriction (PD) was assessed using finger photoelectric plethysmography. PK/PD analysis was carried out using nonlinear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: We found that the computer-controlled infusion pump delivered mean concentrations greater than 0.3 ng ml-1 over the 15-min infusion duration. The peripheral vasoconstrictive effect correlated with dexmedetomidine plasma concentrations during and after the infusion. A three-compartment model provided a better fit to the data than a two-compartment model. CONCLUSIONS: We found that dexmedetomidine-induced vasoconstriction is concentration dependent over time. Dexmedetomidine PK were best estimated by a three-compartment model with allometric scaling. Our results may contribute to future modelling of dexmedetomidine-induced haemodynamic effects.
Authors: Maud A S Weerink; Michel M R F Struys; Laura N Hannivoort; Clemens R M Barends; Anthony R Absalom; Pieter Colin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Simon D Harding; Joanna L Sharman; Elena Faccenda; Chris Southan; Adam J Pawson; Sam Ireland; Alasdair J G Gray; Liam Bruce; Stephen P H Alexander; Stephen Anderton; Clare Bryant; Anthony P Davenport; Christian Doerig; Doriano Fabbro; Francesca Levi-Schaffer; Michael Spedding; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ophélie Vandemoortele; Laura N Hannivoort; Florian Vanhoorebeeck; Michel M R F Struys; Hugo E M Vereecke Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Shubham Chamadia; Juan C Pedemonte; Lauren E Hobbs; Hao Deng; Sarah Nguyen; Luis I Cortinez; Oluwaseun Akeju Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Christian S Guay; Alyssa K Labonte; Michael C Montana; Eric C Landsness; Brendan P Lucey; MohammadMehdi Kafashan; Simon Haroutounian; Michael S Avidan; Emery N Brown; Ben Julian A Palanca Journal: Nat Sci Sleep Date: 2021-03-04