| Literature DB >> 2033769 |
B W Levin1, J M Driscoll, A R Fleischman.
Abstract
Many infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units are the children of women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); they have approximately a 30% risk of infection. To investigate attitudes surrounding treatment for such newborns, we conducted a survey of professionals at six neonatal intensive care units in New York City. A significant proportion of the 247 respondents recommended less aggressive treatment for non-HIV-related conditions for infants at risk for HIV compared with those not at risk. For example, 97% of respondents recommended open heart surgery for an infant with no known HIV risk but only 77% recommended surgery for an infant whose mother had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; if certain the infant was infected, 42% of respondents recommended surgery. We conclude that perceived HIV status may influence decision making about treatment for non-HIV-related conditions for critically ill patients, including infants not actually infected. Ethical issues concerning the relevance of HIV status need to be examined.Entities:
Keywords: Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; New York City; Professional Patient Relationship
Mesh:
Year: 1991 PMID: 2033769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA ISSN: 0098-7484 Impact factor: 56.272