Literature DB >> 20336395

Advances in reprogramming somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells.

Minal Patel1, Shuying Yang.   

Abstract

Traditionally, nuclear reprogramming of cells has been performed by transferring somatic cell nuclei into oocytes, by combining somatic and pluripotent cells together through cell fusion and through genetic integration of factors through somatic cell chromatin. All of these techniques changes gene expression which further leads to a change in cell fate. Here we discuss recent advances in generating induced pluripotent stem cells, different reprogramming methods and clinical applications of iPS cells. Viral vectors have been used to transfer transcription factors (Oct4, Sox2, c-myc, Klf4, and nanog) to induce reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts, neural stem cells, neural progenitor cells, keratinocytes, B lymphocytes and meningeal membrane cells towards pluripotency. Human fibroblasts, neural cells, blood and keratinocytes have also been reprogrammed towards pluripotency. In this review we have discussed the use of viral vectors for reprogramming both animal and human stem cells. Currently, many studies are also involved in finding alternatives to using viral vectors carrying transcription factors for reprogramming cells. These include using plasmid transfection, piggyback transposon system and piggyback transposon system combined with a non viral vector system. Applications of these techniques have been discussed in detail including its advantages and disadvantages. Finally, current clinical applications of induced pluripotent stem cells and its limitations have also been reviewed. Thus, this review is a summary of current research advances in reprogramming cells into induced pluripotent stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20336395      PMCID: PMC2924949          DOI: 10.1007/s12015-010-9123-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep        ISSN: 2629-3277            Impact factor:   5.739


  108 in total

Review 1.  Chromatin remodeling in nuclear cloning.

Authors:  Paul A Wade; Nobuaki Kikyo
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2002-05

2.  Changing potency by spontaneous fusion.

Authors:  Qi-Long Ying; Jennifer Nichols; Edward P Evans; Austin G Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome.

Authors:  W M Rideout ; K Eggan; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The recent history of somatic cloning in mammals.

Authors:  Gottfried Brem; Birgit Kühholzer
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2002

Review 5.  Nuclear transplantation: lessons from frogs and mice.

Authors:  Konrad Hochedlinger; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 6.  Nuclear transplantation, embryonic stem cells, and the potential for cell therapy.

Authors:  Konrad Hochedlinger; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells.

Authors:  M Tada; Y Takahama; K Abe; N Nakatsuji; T Tada
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation.

Authors:  François Gaudet; J Graeme Hodgson; Amir Eden; Laurie Jackson-Grusby; Jessica Dausman; Joe W Gray; Heinrich Leonhardt; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency.

Authors:  Michele Boiani; Sigrid Eckardt; Hans R Schöler; K John McLaughlin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function.

Authors:  Ariel A Avilion; Silvia K Nicolis; Larysa H Pevny; Lidia Perez; Nigel Vivian; Robin Lovell-Badge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  An experimental approach to the generation of human embryonic stem cells equivalents.

Authors:  Katarzyna Skowron; Marcin Tomsia; Piotr Czekaj
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Turning skin into dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Malin Parmar; Johan Jakobsson
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  Cryopreservation of Human Stem Cells for Clinical Application: A Review.

Authors:  Charles J Hunt
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 4.  Small molecules, big roles -- the chemical manipulation of stem cell fate and somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Wenlin Li; Timothy Laurent; Sheng Ding
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  Characterization of the stem cell niche and its importance in radiobiological response.

Authors:  Frank Pajonk; Erina Vlashi
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 6.  Transdifferentiation of Fibroblasts by Defined Factors.

Authors:  Zhiliang Zhao; Mengyao Xu; Meng Wu; Xiaocheng Tian; Cuiping Zhang; Xiaobing Fu
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 7.  Uncoupling T-cell expansion from effector differentiation in cell-based immunotherapy.

Authors:  Joseph G Crompton; Madhusudhanan Sukumar; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

8.  Induced pluripotent mesenchymal stromal cell clones retain donor-derived differences in DNA methylation profiles.

Authors:  Kaifeng Shao; Carmen Koch; Manoj K Gupta; Qiong Lin; Michael Lenz; Stephanie Laufs; Bernd Denecke; Manfred Schmidt; Matthias Linke; Hans C Hennies; Jürgen Hescheler; Martin Zenke; Ulrich Zechner; Tomo Šarić; Wolfgang Wagner
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 9.  [Induced pluripotent stem cells. A new resource in modern medicine].

Authors:  S Liebau; M Stockmann; A Illing; T Seufferlein; A Kleger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  Stemness state regulators SALL4 and SOX2 are involved in progression and invasiveness of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mohammad Mahdi Forghanifard; Sima Ardalan Khales; Afsaneh Javdani-Mallak; Abolfazl Rad; Moein Farshchian; Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.